On 02/08/2012 04:14 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Question before I push: Right now, we have:
>
> tests/readlink/can-{e,f,m}
> tests/readlink/rl-1
> tests/misc/readlink-fp-loop
>
> This feels inconsistent; should we be consolidating all readlink-related
> tests into the same directory, and if so, whic
On 02/08/2012 03:24 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 02/07/2012 12:33 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-02/msg00038.html
>> detailed a couple of bugs in gnulib's canonicalize that were visible
>> through coreutils' readlink, but only on systems where // is dis
On 02/07/2012 12:33 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-02/msg00038.html
> detailed a couple of bugs in gnulib's canonicalize that were visible
> through coreutils' readlink, but only on systems where // is distinct
> from /. This particular test assumes that
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-02/msg00038.html
detailed a couple of bugs in gnulib's canonicalize that were visible
through coreutils' readlink, but only on systems where // is distinct
from /. This particular test assumes that POSIX will be fixed to
require canonicalization o
