Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 08/31/2012 08:42 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>> On 08/31/2012 08:28 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
> As expected, the build now seems faster.
> I haven't yet measured it.
Not wanting to ask work of you but it
On 08/31/2012 08:42 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> On 08/31/2012 08:28 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>>> Jim Meyering wrote:
As expected, the build now seems faster.
I haven't yet measured it.
>>>
>>> Not wanting to ask work of you but it would be great if when all was
>>>
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 08/31/2012 08:28 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>> Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> As expected, the build now seems faster.
>>> I haven't yet measured it.
>>
>> Not wanting to ask work of you but it would be great if when all was
>> said and done there was a posting of the build time t
On 08/31/2012 08:28 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> As expected, the build now seems faster.
>> I haven't yet measured it.
>
> Not wanting to ask work of you but it would be great if when all was
> said and done there was a posting of the build time that changed due
> to the build i
Jim Meyering wrote:
> As expected, the build now seems faster.
> I haven't yet measured it.
Not wanting to ask work of you but it would be great if when all was
said and done there was a posting of the build time that changed due
to the build infrastructure change from recursive to non-recursive
m
On 08/30/2012 03:23 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> Ok?
>
ACK.
Thanks,
Stefano
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 08/30/2012 02:16 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>
>> I've merged those into the appropriate change sets, removed all
>> Signed-off-by: lines and made a few minor wording changes.
>> Please review the differences. If you're happy with the result,
>> I'll push the lot.
>>
> I
On 08/30/2012 02:16 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> I've merged those into the appropriate change sets, removed all
> Signed-off-by: lines and made a few minor wording changes.
> Please review the differences. If you're happy with the result,
> I'll push the lot.
>
I have few nits against myself then
On 08/30/2012 12:10 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> On 08/30/2012 01:14 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> Thanks for all the work.
>>>
>>> Would you please mail to me (or to the list) the concatenation of those
>>> patches
>
> Thanks again. I've begun looking at these changes, so
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 08/30/2012 01:14 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Thanks for all the work.
>>
>> Would you please mail to me (or to the list) the concatenation of those
>> patches
Thanks again. I've begun looking at these changes, so here's
some preliminary feedback.
As expected, the bui
An BTW, now that I notice ...
>>
>> Stefano Lattarini (22):
>> build: don't abuse Automake internals (with its 'check-am' rule)
>> maint: slightly improve .gitignore
>> build: add extra *.texi files to coreutils_TEXINFOS, not EXTRA_DIST
>> build: prefer '$(top_srcdir)/doc' over '$(srcdir)'
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 08/30/2012 01:14 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for all the work.
>>
>> Would you please mail to me (or to the list) the concatenation of those
>> patches
>>
> Sorry to be dense, but: what does "concatenation" mean in this conext
> exactly?
The output of git for
Hi Jim.
On 08/30/2012 01:14 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> Thanks for all the work.
>
> Would you please mail to me (or to the list) the concatenation of those
> patches
>
Sorry to be dense, but: what does "concatenation" mean in this conext
exactly?
> or point me to a repository from which I can p
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> [NOTE: I'm sending this to the main coreutils for lack of a dedicated
>"coreutils-patch" list; I hope it's OK!]
>
> OK, these are the easy pieces actually, but we have to start somewhere.
> This series consists of:
>
> - some preparatory refactorings;
> - the
[NOTE: I'm sending this to the main coreutils for lack of a dedicated
"coreutils-patch" list; I hope it's OK!]
OK, these are the easy pieces actually, but we have to start somewhere.
This series consists of:
- some preparatory refactorings;
- the merging of the "sub build systems" for
15 matches
Mail list logo
