On 10/11/10 13:49, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 10/11/10 13:25, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Here's a patch.
>>
>> The included test is a little unusual.
>> Unlike most such tests, this one does not fail without the fix.
>> However, running it against a valgrind-wrapped does expose the bug.
>>
>> Any sugges
On 10/11/10 13:25, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Here's a patch.
>
> The included test is a little unusual.
> Unlike most such tests, this one does not fail without the fix.
> However, running it against a valgrind-wrapped does expose the bug.
>
> Any suggestions for a better way (even O/S- or kernel-spe
Here's a patch.
The included test is a little unusual.
Unlike most such tests, this one does not fail without the fix.
However, running it against a valgrind-wrapped does expose the bug.
Any suggestions for a better way (even O/S- or kernel-specific)
to test this would be most welcome. While I'm