On 02/07/2012 02:30 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 02/07/2012 07:59 AM, francky.l...@telenet.be wrote:
>> I was wondering wether I couldn't write something like
>>
>> if [not on NTFS filesystem] then
>> chmod +x
>
> No doubt you can write something like that.
> I don't use NTFS, so I'm not a good s
On 02/07/2012 07:59 AM, francky.l...@telenet.be wrote:
> I was wondering wether I couldn't write something like
>
> if [not on NTFS filesystem] then
> chmod +x
No doubt you can write something like that.
I don't use NTFS, so I'm not a good source of advice
about the details.
Dear Paul,
thanks for your reply, but this was not what I meant.
I have scripts that work fine on a full Linux platform (ext filesystem).
However, if I use those scipts (that use chmod +x), I get a lot of warnings.
Thing I dislike to see, and are confusing.
I was wondering wether I couldn't writ
On 02/07/2012 05:49 AM, francky.l...@telenet.be wrote:
> is there any way I could suppress the warning given by chmod +x?
You can suppress all warnings with the shell command:
chmod +x file 2>/dev/null;:
This is usually not a good idea. The warnings are there
for a reason.
Dear Bob,
is there any way I could suppress the warning given by chmod +x?
Best regards,
FRancky
- Oorspronkelijk e-mail -
> francky.l...@telenet.be wrote:
> > some more questions.
> > I abstract a file system as something where each dir/file has a
> > header
> > where all properties r
Bob Proulx writes:
>
> francky.l...@telenet.be wrote:
>
> > There doesn't exist a hybrid file system that unites eg. NTFS and ext4?
>
> No. Not as far as I know.
In the old days there was UMSDOS.
A modern equivalent of UMSDOS is POSIX Overlay Filesystem (posixovl). It
works in FUSE. http://so
francky.l...@telenet.be wrote:
> some more questions.
> I abstract a file system as something where each dir/file has a header
> where all properties reside.
Yes. This information is stored in the Inode. You can read about it here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inode
> There doesn't exist a h
Francky Leyn wrote:
> Dear Bob,
>
> thanks for your intervention.
> The problem is a lot clearer to me right now.
>
> It is indead a Virtual Box on top of Windows 7 with an NTFS system
> and the Linux virtual box is Ubuntu 11.04.
NTFS doesn't have any concept of the same file modes as a Uni
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> francky.l...@telenet.be wrote:
> > ubuntu@ubuntu-VirtualBox:~/.gvfs/account on stockholm/Documents/03
> > professional/structured_documentation$ chmod +x
> > doc/filters_for_this_document
> > chmod: changing permissions of `doc/filters_for_this_document': Operation
> > no
tags 10735 notabug
On 02/06/2012 02:23 PM, francky.l...@telenet.be wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I perform the following:
>
> ubuntu@ubuntu-VirtualBox:~/.gvfs/account on stockholm/Documents/03
> professional/structured_documentation$ ls -l doc/filters_for_this_document
> -rwx-- 1 ubuntu ubuntu
Hello,
I perform the following:
ubuntu@ubuntu-VirtualBox:~/.gvfs/account on stockholm/Documents/03
professional/structured_documentation$ ls -l doc/filters_for_this_document
-rwx-- 1 ubuntu ubuntu 98 2012-02-06 14:47 doc/filters_for_this_document
ubuntu@ubuntu-VirtualBox:~/.gvfs/account
11 matches
Mail list logo
