Re: make check-expensive [was: [PATCH] rm, du, chmod, chown, chgrp: use much less memory for large directories]

2011-09-19 Thread Jim Meyering
Bernhard Voelker wrote: > On 08/24/2011 12:24 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> If you would find some testing-related make shortcut to be useful, >> please propose a patch, preferably without modifying all tests ;-) > > From 4c994ab75a3d0c2eda5aa9246388dccf5058f250 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Bernha

Re: make check-expensive [was: [PATCH] rm, du, chmod, chown, chgrp: use much less memory for large directories]

2011-08-24 Thread Bernhard Voelker
On 08/24/2011 12:24 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: If you would find some testing-related make shortcut to be useful, please propose a patch, preferably without modifying all tests ;-) From 4c994ab75a3d0c2eda5aa9246388dccf5058f250 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bernhard Voelker Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011

Re: make check-expensive [was: [PATCH] rm, du, chmod, chown, chgrp: use much less memory for large directories]

2011-08-24 Thread Jim Meyering
Bernhard Voelker wrote: > On 08/24/2011 11:42 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Bernhard Voelker wrote: >> >>> On 08/24/2011 10:49 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: Voelker, Bernhard wrote: > BTW: Wouldn't this test deserve a proper make target, e.g. > "make check-expensive"? Yes, good idea.

Re: make check-expensive [was: [PATCH] rm, du, chmod, chown, chgrp: use much less memory for large directories]

2011-08-24 Thread Bernhard Voelker
On 08/24/2011 11:42 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: Bernhard Voelker wrote: On 08/24/2011 10:49 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: Voelker, Bernhard wrote: BTW: Wouldn't this test deserve a proper make target, e.g. "make check-expensive"? Yes, good idea. That would make it easier to run just those test. Howe

Re: make check-expensive [was: [PATCH] rm, du, chmod, chown, chgrp: use much less memory for large directories]

2011-08-24 Thread Jim Meyering
Bernhard Voelker wrote: > On 08/24/2011 10:49 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Voelker, Bernhard wrote: >>> BTW: Wouldn't this test deserve a proper make target, e.g. >>> "make check-expensive"? >> >> Yes, good idea. >> That would make it easier to run just those test. >> >> However, hard-coding the lis

make check-expensive [was: [PATCH] rm, du, chmod, chown, chgrp: use much less memory for large directories]

2011-08-24 Thread Bernhard Voelker
On 08/24/2011 10:49 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: Voelker, Bernhard wrote: BTW: Wouldn't this test deserve a proper make target, e.g. "make check-expensive"? Yes, good idea. That would make it easier to run just those test. However, hard-coding the list of expensive and very-expensive tests would r