Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 08/24/2011 12:24 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> If you would find some testing-related make shortcut to be useful,
>> please propose a patch, preferably without modifying all tests ;-)
>
> From 4c994ab75a3d0c2eda5aa9246388dccf5058f250 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Bernha
On 08/24/2011 12:24 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
If you would find some testing-related make shortcut to be useful,
please propose a patch, preferably without modifying all tests ;-)
From 4c994ab75a3d0c2eda5aa9246388dccf5058f250 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bernhard Voelker
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011
Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 08/24/2011 11:42 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/24/2011 10:49 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> BTW: Wouldn't this test deserve a proper make target, e.g.
> "make check-expensive"?
Yes, good idea.
On 08/24/2011 11:42 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Bernhard Voelker wrote:
On 08/24/2011 10:49 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
BTW: Wouldn't this test deserve a proper make target, e.g.
"make check-expensive"?
Yes, good idea.
That would make it easier to run just those test.
Howe
Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 08/24/2011 10:49 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
>>> BTW: Wouldn't this test deserve a proper make target, e.g.
>>> "make check-expensive"?
>>
>> Yes, good idea.
>> That would make it easier to run just those test.
>>
>> However, hard-coding the lis
On 08/24/2011 10:49 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
BTW: Wouldn't this test deserve a proper make target, e.g.
"make check-expensive"?
Yes, good idea.
That would make it easier to run just those test.
However, hard-coding the list of expensive and very-expensive
tests would r