While there is nothing wrong with wc as is, a suggestion after some use.
With wc -l it emits the line count and the program name(s) as "nnn
program-name".
With the additional switch option, it would be convenient to drop the program
name.
It would be equivalent to `wc -l programname | cu
On 04/05/15 00:30, Leslie S Satenstein wrote:
> While there is nothing wrong with wc as is, a suggestion after some use.
>
> With wc -l it emits the line count and the program name(s) as "nnn
> program-name".
>
> With the additional switch option, it would be convenient to drop the program
On 03 May 2015 23:30, Leslie S Satenstein wrote:
> While there is nothing wrong with wc as is, a suggestion after some use.
>
> With wc -l it emits the line count and the program name(s) as "nnn
> program-name".
> With the additional switch option, it would be convenient to drop the program
