Re: [Cosign-discuss] This friggin' sucks....

2009-02-27 Thread Trek Glowacki
To be fair to Bob, the documentation for the cosign compile, install, and configure process is a bit lacking compared to what people might expect from other open source projects. We were able to get cosign installed for a non-profit that needed single sign on, but only by cobbling together d

Re: [Cosign-discuss] This friggin' sucks....

2009-02-27 Thread Richard Blocker
Trek Glowacki wrote: > To be fair to Bob, the documentation for the cosign compile, install, > and configure process is a bit lacking compared to what people might > expect from other open source projects. > > We were able to get cosign installed for a non-profit that needed > single sign on

Re: [Cosign-discuss] This friggin' sucks....

2009-02-27 Thread Mark Montague
I won't repeat anything Wes has said. Please read his message. Also, note that I just run the production cosign servers for the University of Michigan, I'm not one of the cosign developers/maintainers. On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 8:37 PM, Bob Radvanovsky wrote: > (2) I have Red Hat Enterprise Lin