On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Jon Nelson writes:
>
> >> > OK. However, 'mailq' did not, at any point, show this message.
> >> > I had to manually remove the message (I suppose I could have used
> >> > cancelmsg from the information from the logs, but I forgot).
> >> > Why would mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
how do i have to configure courer-mlm for newsletters?
I would like to use the handling of bounces of courier-mlm, but there
should be only one address, that can send to that newsletter.
As I see it now, I have to setup a moderated list with
POST=mod
And then a
Jon Nelson writes:
> OK. However, 'mailq' did not, at any point, show this message.
> I had to manually remove the message (I suppose I could have used
> cancelmsg from the information from the logs, but I forgot).
> Why would mailq not have shown the message?
Dunno. Need more details.
What deta
Sweet - for those of us who understood that - well it is a thought provoking
concept!
I wonder what other unsafe combinations might exist...
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sam
Varshavchik
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 3:57 PM
To: [EMA
Hi,
how do i have to configure courer-mlm for newsletters?
I would like to use the handling of bounces of courier-mlm, but there
should be only one address, that can send to that newsletter.
As I see it now, I have to setup a moderated list with
POST=mod
And then approve the mail of the news
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Jon Nelson writes:
>
> >
> > Dec 2 10:26:21 honker courierd:
> > started,id=E495.3FCCBD2D.2488,from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,module=esmtp,
> > host=domain.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED],addr=<[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Why does this li
Bowie Bailey writes:
I'm not sure why I am seeing these messages from some mail servers:
451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve
The dns is fine as far as I can tell. A dig for buc.com on my external dns
server gives me this:
;; ANSWER SECTION:
buc.com.
Bowie Bailey wrote:
I'm not sure why I am seeing these messages from some mail servers:
451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve
That's odd. A friend of mine started seeing the same thing just today.
His DNS servers are the same as they've been for a long time.
Lars HolmstrÃm writes:
 HTML content follows Â
This is a mailing list, not a web site. Please format your message
accordingly.
20:52:40.624503 arp who-has 172.24.99.5 tell pc033.flysta.net
20:52:43.453568 mail2.45023 > pc033.flysta.net.auth: S
540138836:540138836(0) win 5840 (DF)
Why does the m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Is there is solution for incoming emails with char '&' in sender email
address:
In order for a solution to exist, one requirement must be met: a problem
must exist before hand.
You need to explain, beforehand, what the actual problem is.
# mailq
Size
Jon Nelson writes:
Dec 2 10:26:21 honker courierd:
started,id=E495.3FCCBD2D.2488,from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,module=esmtp,
host=domain.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED],addr=<[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Why does this line show [EMAIL PROTECTED] after the host= part?
Because that's how the
Mitch (WebCob) writes:
For example:
info@ is an alias of my account. MOST of the mail that goes there is junk,
so I move it to a different folder and NEVER want a vacation reply sent to
it.
If you want to filter mail to a specific address, DON'T alias it to your
general bit bucket. Make it a rea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm receiving this error during configure:
checking for stream pipes... socketpair
checking for SSL_load_error_strings in -lssl... yes
checking whether OpenSSL requires Kerberos... configure: error: OpenSSL
test build failed
configure: error: /bin/sh './configure' failed
Gordon Messmer writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Mark Clements writes:
Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
some users have reported trouble when using 4.1.25... What revision
are you using?
That's the one. This problem has been around for a while but seemed to
have been fixed in the last b
Devin Bayer writes:
On Monday, Dec 1, 2003, at 12:16 US/Eastern, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
The only solution I've come up with to this problem is to reject
blocked
addresses *before* you close the connecting with the sending mail
server,
and the only MTA that can do this nicely that I've found is
Hanford, Seth wrote:
My example recipe looks like this:
if ( /^X-Spam-Status: Yes/ )
xfilter "/usr/local/bin/relaydb -b -f /usr/local/share/relaydb"
else
xfilter "/usr/local/bin/relaydb -w -f /usr/local/share/relaydb"
Unfortunately, mail comes in, but gets lost after the appropriate entries
are
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 19:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there is solution for incoming emails with char '&' in sender email
> address:
>
> # mailq
> Size Queue IDDate
> User From
> Status Recipient
> --
I'm not sure why I am seeing these messages from some mail servers:
451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve
The dns is fine as far as I can tell. A dig for buc.com on my external dns
server gives me this:
;; ANSWER SECTION:
buc.com.28800
Just check the list, I had this problem, there currently is no fix
available.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN's Audience Survey.
Help shape OSDN's sites and tell us what you think. Take this
five minute survey and you could win a $25
I
downloaded the tarball for 0.44, build the RPMs and did an rpm -Uvh on
my0.42 courier running RH8.0 system All users can run IMAP and
popAll users can run WEBmailA lot of mails are received from hosts on
internet.My local users connected via LAN behind a NAT box have problems
though First
Hello,
Is there is solution for incoming emails with char '&' in sender email
address:
# mailq
Size Queue IDDate
User From
Status Recipient
-
976.8K
Running Postfix + Courier Maildrop + SpamAssassin. I'm trying to use
maildrop in conjunction with relaydb, much like it is described here for
Procmail: http://www.benzedrine.cx/relaydb.html
I would like to set a global filtering rule in /etc/maildroprc such that all
mail tagged as spam is marked
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Mark Clements writes:
Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
some users have reported trouble when using 4.1.25... What revision
are you using?
That's the one. This problem has been around for a while but seemed to
have been fixed in the last beta version 3.6.1.200311
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 16:45, Jon Nelson wrote:
> Questions:
> 1. What went wrong?
If you want multiple recipients you specify them separated by whitespace, not
by a comma. This message was injected with ONE recipient since there was no
whitespace between the address "[EMAIL PROTECTED],[
I sent an email that had a bad recipient.
I will sanitize the actual recipients and the recipient MX, but
otherwise everything is the same.
Instead of being sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(there were two recipients)
I accidentally sent it to
[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Hmmm -don't know why, but I don't see this header in recent versions...
and
>> when I look back at 0.38 - where I DO see it, it shows the account
delivered
>> to not the ALIAS like the envelope to would suggest.
>
>Since one is derived from the other, the two are equivalent.
>
>The Delivered-To:
I think you've stumbled onto why people are using "exception" blocks in
their maildrop rules.
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joe
Emenaker
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 1:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [courier-users] Maildrop que
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hi,
I have some errors with a
517-Domain does not exist: arpmuseum.de
I see, that there is no A record for this domain? is this right?
That's fine, as long as the domain has MX records.
Ok, so if i put the domain with its ip into etc/esmtproutes, courier
should be abl
Aleksander Adamowski writes:
Anybody knows how to set the IMAP_EMPTYTRASH variable in imapd to
automatically empty a subfolder (instead of only top-level folders like
"Trash" and "Sent")?
Folder.Subfolder
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--On Montag, 1. Dezember 2003 12:25 -0800 Ricardo Kleemann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've adjusted module.esmtp to:
>
> NAME=esmtp
> PRIORITY=50
> PROG=./courieresmtp
> MAXDELS=500
> MAXHOST=75
75 paralell deliveries to one single host is abusive, cant be
legit mail.
>> Have you considered t
I'm receiving this error during configure:
checking for stream pipes... socketpair
checking for SSL_load_error_strings in -lssl... yes
checking whether OpenSSL requires Kerberos... configure: error: OpenSSL
test build failed
configure: error: /bin/sh './configure' failed for tcpd
courier-0.44.2
Re
Mark Clements writes:
Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
some users have reported trouble when using 4.1.25... What revision
are you using?
That's the one. This problem has been around for a while but seemed to
have been fixed in the last beta version 3.6.1.20031119. It appears to
have re
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 10:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If courier decides a message is from a bad domain (error 517), so it´s
> because the domain is not in dns. I understood that.
>
> I want to know, on which criteria does courier decide about this?
>
> Which part of the sent mail is does c
Hi,
ok, sorry, my english is not very good, so I try to ask more
precisely.
If courier decides a message is from a bad domain (error 517), so it´s
because the domain is not in dns. I understood that.
I want to know, on which criteria does courier decide about this?
Which part of the sent mail i
I just found out that I've been losing a lot of my mail.
I've been using spamassassin and amavis-ng (calling ClamAV) via the
xfilter command in maildrop to manage incoming mail.
The problem is... it seems that my copy of spamassassin started freaking
out and it was dropping an assortment of my
Hello,
I'm running Redhat 8.0 fully updated on dual cpu system. After building and
installing courier 44.1 and 44.2 my system hang every night. Courier is
built with rpmbuilt -ta and installed with rpm -Uvh. Replacing courier 0.43
with new one is only change to system. Same instalation ( redha
Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
Yes! How exactly can I do that? As long as courier can
continue chewing through the mailq and send out all the
queued up outgoing mail, I have no problem temporarily
shutting down the incoming smtp. I'm just not sure how to do
that.
esmtpd stop
---
On Monday, Dec 1, 2003, at 12:16 US/Eastern, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 09:08:49PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Devin Bayer writes:
Justification:
For more than a year now I have been giving everybody a different
email
address and using maildrop to filter all the addresses
Hello,
I have maildirquota enable that works thru .mailfilter file
it consists the line
xfilter "deliverquota -w 90 5000S ./Maildir"
...
The quotawarn message delivers ok to user maildir. And reply to sender that
quota is over is sent to.
But I cant understand the 0-size(bytes) messag
39 matches
Mail list logo
