Hi Lloyd.
Would like to hear what others think including Sam - but it sounds like the
best of a bad situation to me. I wonder how the effort and overhead you are
making compare with a patch to courier that would allow modification of
message files during global filtering. Although such an option m
1) there is no reason this would remain constant
2) as this value is only used locally, it wouldn't be that quick to leak (relative to
other leaks of addresses
3) it would be very easy to rotate this regularly to keep it from being guessed
4) there would be a trail of received headers that could b
Hi,
does courier override dns mx entries with it´s local settings? I have
a situation, where this happens. I would like to change this.
Server.A is a machine that is configured as a Fallback Mail Server. If
the main.mailserver.dom is offline, dns A records change and Server.A
will be main.mailser
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:09:19 -0800
Moshe Gurvich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diligently divulged:
> I have working Courier + SpamAssassin + Amavis + F-Prot setup without
> patching anything.
>
> /etc/courier/courierd:
> #=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#
> DEFAULTDELIVERY="| /usr/sbin/amavis | /usr/lib/courier/bin/mai
From: Moshe Gurvich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I have virtual users using MySQL, so spamc/spamd won't work, need to
> use spamassassin executable to read .spamassassin in virtual users
> homes.
Actually, you can use spamc/spamd with virtual users, you just need to
do a bit of configuration.
M
Mitch (WebCob) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think Roland answered most of this already - except to say that the way
> to exclude messages from refiltering was to set an
> X-Already-Seen-By-My-Filter
> header so that you could skip re-running if you saw that header.
That's a bad idea, since any spa
Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> [...]
> It would be so nice if courier allowed adding,removing or modifying
> message headers at filter-time.
>
What about environment variables?
They are not saved in the control file, are they?
---
The SF.Net email i
I think Roland answered most of this already - except to say that the way to
exclude messages from refiltering was to set an X-Already-Seen-By-My-Filter
header so that you could skip re-running if you saw that header. Suggested
injection method was I belive by sendmail call.
m/
> -Original Me
are you using sun's ldap or open ldap ?
courier compiled and linked fine against sun's
ldap libraries, but I can't figure out how to test it.
I suppose, that if it sends requests then some functionality
is definitely there, but how to troubleshoot it ?
I did play around with the settings, some thi
In one or two other threads, I mentioned a Modest Proposal for a small
change in Courier. I'm about to start work on a patch and a piece of
add-on software that implement this proposal, and so I want to describe
it here, in a bit more detail.
The problem I'm trying to solve is this: for reasons o
--On Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2004 11:41 +0100 Alessandro Vesely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Or try the reinjection method suggested by Sam. No database required. Use
>> the existing filter model.
>
> And the injection method suggested was?
>
> I was going to try reinjecting it with SMTP. But th
"Mitch (WebCob)" wrote:
>
> There IS a way to do this, it's just a bit ugly (IMHO at least).
>
> Sam says the way is to run your filter and read the message file - do any
> rewriting you want to, and inject a new message. The control file can be
> modified to indicate successful delivery of the f
Hi
I have a similar problem with the authentication.
You have to configure the authdaemonrc and authldaprc files and you need
some more
attributes in your LDAP entries (like mail, homeDirectory..).
I tried authentication via imapd (mozilla) and get always
"authentication failed".
In the logs i
13 matches
Mail list logo
