I'm not sure, but I thought localhost was expempt from this limit, which
would let you connect unlimited times if you went through a tunnel -
alternatively, you could run two daemons - one for your webmail, and one for
your other users - BUT, your webmail probably can't have any more
connections th
Hey Matt - I never realized the Trash folder was undeletable... if that's
the case, I imagine that is hardcoded - you could look... and add your own
folder. I do remember discussion of placing files owner by another user
inside the folders to prevent them from being deleted. If you experiment,
you
Hi.
(B
(BI am using dynamic delivery instruction in
(B/etc/courier/aliasdir/courier-default .
(BThe external program makes a lookup into a database and decides where is the
(Bfinal destination. I want to make it such that if the lookup fails, the mta
(Breturns 550 User unknown to the client p
hi,
thanks Sam for courier-imap server.
it's really best!
i am using this over 2 years.
request:
please add per tcp/ip:netmask MAXPERIP options for courier-imap server.
problem:
using webmail (squirrelmail and smm) for access to mail boxes (about 5000
users, and set MAXPERIP=5000).
but same user
Jacobs, Andre writes:
 HTML content follows Â
Failure running .make after configuring courier-imap
Hello,
ÂÂÂ I am running into a wall. I am trying to configure and install
courier-imap, to be used with postfix, which I successfully built and
installed. My problem is that the make script is
Title: Failure running .make after configuring courier-imap
Hello,
I am running into a wall. I am trying to configure and install courier-imap, to be used with postfix, which I successfully built and installed. My problem is that the make script is looking for openssl/ssl.h and err.h
I won't quote more than necessary, but I *would* like to say thanks for
clarifying. That most certainly helps out. I'm still a little unclear
as to where exactly global filters are invoked and played with, but
since I'm composing this email after having read a few responses (which
ask questions
I have an exim router that automatically handles spam for virtual users,
by delivering it to a Maildir/.Spam folder. I would like to make this
folder "undeletable", like the Trash to maintain the integrity of the exim
router. Is there an easy way to do this, or is the Trash functionality
hard-cod
Markus Wernig writes:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:22:37 -0500
Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diligently divulged:
The submit process is responsible for inserting a new message into the mail
queue. submit gets invoked by sendmail, courieresmtpd, or the courierdsn
modules, as a child process.
[...]
John BOSSERT writes:
Current issue - setting up ESMTP to use (simple) authentication.
ESMTP is showing me:
220 hermes.unifiedsignal.com ESMTP
250-Requested mail action okay, completed
There is no such message "Requested mail action okay, completed" in Courier.
Whatever this is, it's not Courier
> -Original Message-
> From: Anand Buddhdev
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 3:09 PM
> > There is probably an obvious fix for this, but I'm noticing that
> > emails to a particular domain are failing. I'm receiving
> > the following in the diagnostics output:
> >
> > I0 P mail.sarc
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:22:37 -0500
Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diligently divulged:
> The submit process is responsible for inserting a new message into the mail
> queue. submit gets invoked by sendmail, courieresmtpd, or the courierdsn
> modules, as a child process.
> [...]
> Not that
Hey Sam - Thanks!
I think I understand a lot better, and imagine others do too... And of
course if it isn't said often enough - we appreciate that you have a day job
too and that there are always priorities... Now, for those of use who want
to hack... I have a counter proposal...
First the long t
Current issue - setting up ESMTP to use (simple) authentication.
ESMTP is showing me:
220 hermes.unifiedsignal.com ESMTP
250-Requested mail action okay, completed
250-8BITMIME
250 SIZE
No mention of:
250-AUTH LOGIN DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
(I wouldn't expect to see DIGEST-MD5 or PLAIN, per ESM
Stefan Hornburg writes:
Hello,
I would like to know how to use Comodo SSL certificates with Courier
POP/IMAP etc. Setting up Apache to recognize this is a no-brainer ...
For Courier I did the following steps:
- put the Comodo root certificates into /usr/lib/courier/rootcerts alongside
with the
search for locallowercase in the manual. The restriction is that ALL your
user names and aliases MUST be in lower case... then all mixed case names
will be converted to lower case before matching and local delivery.
hth
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Jon Nelson writes:
Mr. Sam: could you please give us a detailed "process overview" as to
how messages go from (say, esmtpd) through submit, through the global
filters, and then the final signaling of courierd? If the queue docs on
courier-mta.org are close but a bit out of date (I don't see /any
Other than having to specify an MX for a domain I don't administer,
this worked great. Thanks!
Anand Buddhdev wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 02:19:43PM -0800, Bill Taroli wrote:
There is probably an obvious fix for this, but I'm noticing that emails
to a particular domain are fa
Derrick T. Woolworth writes:
I think its important to the evolution of Courier that it eventually support
modification of messages from any courierfilter. I've never quite understood
why this isn't allowed - possibly a filesize issue, security? I would only be
guessing, but in the grand schem
Jon Nelson writes:
I come from a qmail background, and it seems to me that 'submit' takes
the place of qmail-inject and qmail-queue. It also seems like there
might be some benefit to writing a qmail-inject-like wrapper for submit.
Submit takes place of qmail-queue. sendmail takes place of qmail-
Mitch (WebCob) writes:
Looking forward to the benchmarks - and also secretly wanting to try
modifying a message file to see what happens. Maybe we misunderstood Sam -
it is possible a modification could be ok as long as it doesn't corrupt the
mime envelope?? Just a thought...
No. The only modific
Hi
This is just a question out of curiosity, not a problem:
The sql database has a field home, with an absolute path to the
(virtual) home directory, e.g. /var/mail/directory/account
Is there a way to tell the authmysqlrc that there is a prefix which has
to be put before every home directory?
My
touch $COURIER_PREFIX/etc/locallowercase
On 13/02/2004, at 11:33 AM, Flavio Stanchina wrote:
Is there a way to tell Courier that user names should be treated as
case-insensitive?
I know I should educate my users until they understand that email
addresses are case-sensitive, but until then...
-
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:33:45PM +0100, Flavio Stanchina wrote:
> Is there a way to tell Courier that user names should be treated as
> case-insensitive?
>
> I know I should educate my users until they understand that email
> addresses are case-sensitive, but until then...
man courier, and s
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 02:19:43PM -0800, Bill Taroli wrote:
> There is probably an obvious fix for this, but I'm noticing that emails
> to a particular domain are failing. I'm receiving the following in the
> diagnostics output:
>
> I0 P mail.sarc.org [207.215.13.60]
> I0 S STARTTLS
> I0 T smt
Is there a way to tell Courier that user names should be treated as
case-insensitive?
I know I should educate my users until they understand that email
addresses are case-sensitive, but until then...
--
Ciao,
Flavio Stanchina
Trento - Italy
There is probably an obvious fix for this, but I'm noticing that emails
to a particular domain are failing. I'm receiving the following in the
diagnostics output:
I0 P mail.sarc.org [207.215.13.60]
I0 S STARTTLS
I0 T smtp
I0 R 454 4.3.3 TLS not available
I checked to confirm that the *_TLS_REQUI
Quick question re- blacklists...
the webadmin page lists the 'A' Record setting as optional for a
particular blacklist zone,
Is the Courier default "127.0.0.2" or "any record"?
(spamhaus.org have a "combined" lookup that may return 127.0.0.2 or
127.0.0.4)
regards,
Drew
--
Hmm - that's interesting. Really could use more documentation to this
topic (scheme, more about the filters). A Howto would be excellent. ;)
Regards,
David.
V Čt, 12. 02. 2004 v 17:22, Jon Nelson píše:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, David Bruha wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I am now fighting my way through config
"Mitch \(WebCob\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ ... ]
>
> Looking forward to the benchmarks - and also secretly wanting to try
> modifying a message file to see what happens. Maybe we misunderstood Sam -
> it is possible a modification could be ok as long as it doesn't corrupt the
> mime envelo
> I think that's a great idea! However, my suggestion would be to use
> submit to your advantage here. The "submit" protocol is well documented
> somewhere (I read it for over an hour the other night) and while a
> little unwieldy IMO it also seems like the best way to do injection.
>
> I come fr
I've had my Courier 0.44 install using Comodo certs -- that I also first
used with apache -- working fine for a while now. The trick is that you
have to split the certificate from the trusted certs. The cert for my
domain (kept in /usr/lib/courier/share) was supplied in the config using
TLS_CER
"Malcolm Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Lloyd Zusman
>> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 4:15 AM
>
> [ Snip ]
>
>> And as for this patch itself, remember that it consists
>> solely of putting a unique "id" field into the "Received"
>> header. This is a
On Thursday 12 February 2004 15:49, Eric Livingston wrote:
> I have an alias for postmaster, like this:
>
> postmaster: eric
>
> This appears near the bottom and seems to work in general, as several other
> aliases that point to postmaster do wind up getting to my account just
> fine.
run "makeali
Me too. If it's still a long way off, then maybe this is the way to go - on
the other hand if Sam can provide some guidance as to where one would have
to look to start making such a change - and perhaps what the bigger
challenges are, then maybe we can amass enough effort amounst us to make it
happ
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, David Bruha wrote:
> Hi,
> I am now fighting my way through configuring courier-mta with virus and
> spam filtering and I must admit I lack some good documentation for that.
>
> I have read about the rejection/re-insertion metodology and would like
> to ask you if you could en
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
> Well, from what I know about the structure of Courier, it would take
> a lot of refactoring to allow the modification of messages during
> a global filter. That's because the message file that we see during
> this step is a temporary file. The "real" me
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Jansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Courier Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [courier-users] can't find [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thursday 12 February 2004 13:19, Eric Livingston wrote:
> > Yet, I get error
> -Original Message-
> From: Lloyd Zusman
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 4:15 AM
[ Snip ]
> And as for this patch itself, remember that it consists
> solely of putting a unique "id" field into the "Received"
> header. This is a minor change, and it mirrors what some
> other MTA's
Hello,
I would like to know how to use Comodo SSL certificates with Courier
POP/IMAP etc. Setting up Apache to recognize this is a no-brainer ...
For Courier I did the following steps:
- put the Comodo root certificates into /usr/lib/courier/rootcerts alongside
with the shipped one
- run c_reh
On Thursday 12 February 2004 13:19, Eric Livingston wrote:
> Yet, I get error messages emailed to me with 550 errors, saying that
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is an unknown user.
>
> What am I missing? My aliases file started with:
>
> root: postmaster
If you'll forgive one of those "maybe you missed the o
Hi,
I am now fighting my way through configuring courier-mta with virus and
spam filtering and I must admit I lack some good documentation for that.
I have read about the rejection/re-insertion metodology and would like
to ask you if you could enlighten me about it a little bit more. As far
as I u
I have www.my-domain.com listed in the following places:
In /etc/courier/locals:
my-domain.com
.my-domain.com
www.my-domain.com
in /etc/courier/me:
www.my-domain.com
Yet, I get error messages emailed to me with 550 errors, saying that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is an unknown user.
What am I missing?
Lloyd Zusman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ ... ]
>
> And as for this patch itself, remember that it consists solely of
> putting a unique "id" field into the "Received" header. This is a minor
> change, and it mirrors what some other MTA's already do. Even if we
> don't end up using this to fa
Peter Holm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does courier override dns mx entries with it´s local settings? I have
> a situation, where this happens. I would like to change this.
>
courier does not change any dns settings, however if a domain is in
hosteddomains or in locals it is treated as such and will attempt
"Mitch \(WebCob\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Lloyd.
>
> Would like to hear what others think including Sam - but it sounds like the
> best of a bad situation to me. I wonder how the effort and overhead you are
> making compare with a patch to courier that would allow modification of
> messa
> I think Roland answered most of this already - except to say that the way to
> exclude messages from refiltering was to set an X-Already-Seen-By-My-Filter
> header so that you could skip re-running if you saw that header. Suggested
> injection method was I belive by sendmail call.
>
The X-Alrea
Nice one, thank you
> $TCPREMOTEHOST (and/or maybe $TCPLOCALPORT) is all you need.
>
> Courier currently lacks some mechanism to exclude hosts from filtering.
> One easy to implement solution could be to skip the filtering-stage
> alltogether when RELAYCLIENT (and maybe BLOCK="") ist set.
>
> Bu
I think its important to the evolution of Courier that it eventually support
modification of messages from any courierfilter. I've never quite understood
why this isn't allowed - possibly a filesize issue, security? I would only be
guessing, but in the grand scheme of things I'm sure there's a
49 matches
Mail list logo
