Re: [courier-users] deleted maildrop -resolved-

2008-06-03 Thread Jan Müller
Thank you! file restored > From: Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:08:41 -0400 > Subject: Re: [courier-users] deleted maildrop > Jan Müller wrote: >> I accidentaly deleted the maildrop configuration file: >> /usr/lib/courier/etc/m

Re: [courier-users] GFS

2008-06-03 Thread Dino Ciuffetti
> Pawel Tecza wrote: >> Did you try also another distributed file systems, for example Coda >> or Lustre? What's your opinion? Hi. I didn't try any distributed fs, but... if you want a way to do RAID1 over ETHERNET you can use DRBD (http://www.drbd.org/) with heartbeat to mount the filesystem on

Re: [courier-users] GFS

2008-06-03 Thread Paweł Tęcza
On Wt, 2008-06-03 at 12:56 +0200, Dino Ciuffetti wrote: > > Pawel Tecza wrote: > >> Did you try also another distributed file systems, for example Coda > >> or Lustre? What's your opinion? > > Hi. I didn't try any distributed fs, but... > if you want a way to do RAID1 over ETHERNET you can use DR

Re: [courier-users] GFS

2008-06-03 Thread Paweł Tęcza
On Pn, 2008-06-02 at 10:04 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote: > Pawel Tecza wrote: > > > > Sorry for off topic, but I'm very curious about your experiences with > > GFS for Courier, because we think about using any distributed file > > system in our mail system. Could you please write us more about it? >

Re: [courier-users] GFS

2008-06-03 Thread Bowie Bailey
Pawel Tecza wrote: > On Pn, 2008-06-02 at 10:04 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > Pawel Tecza wrote: > > > > > > Sorry for off topic, but I'm very curious about your experiences > > > with GFS for Courier, because we think about using any > > > distributed file system in our mail system. Could you pl

Re: [courier-users] GFS

2008-06-03 Thread Paweł Tęcza
On Wt, 2008-06-03 at 09:18 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote: > Pawel Tecza wrote: > > Hello Bowie, > > > > Thanks a lot for your feedback! It's good to know about > > ATA-over-Ethernet, but we have just iSCSI storage (Infotrend EonStor > > A16E-G2130-4), so we rather will not use AoE. > > > > Is it a

Re: [courier-users] courierimapkeywords = massive disk io

2008-06-03 Thread Jonathan Briggs
Forgive me, but something else I forgot to ask is if anyone else has run into imapkeywords feature causing massive diskio on large mailboxes (more than 4,000 messages in one folder). I was only able to identify the problem when doing an strace on imapd process. Yes, just today. I was sear

Re: [courier-users] courierimapkeywords = massive disk io

2008-06-03 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Jonathan Briggs writes: The IMAP command for each message is something like UID STORE (etc, etc). I noticed that it seems to be taking DAYS to complete this operation.  Courier slows down exponentially as the list of messages with keywords increases. You don't notice it with a few h

[courier-users] too many connections

2008-06-03 Thread Curtis Vaughan
I have an issue whereby clients are unable to connect to Courier Imap with the error that there are too many connections from their IP. I have changed the following parameter as follows: MAXPERIP=40 in the imapd file. I restarted courier imap, but still the same problem. It is particularly appar