Re: [courier-users] Backup MX, was Courier::Filter rejecting over-zealously

Ben Kennedy writes: Sam Varshavchik wrote at 7:07 AM (-0400) on 8/10/11: >> That's an interesting and clever approach. Would this properly pass >through >> ad hoc local-part extensions, e.g. for mail addressed to user- >> someth...@example.com -> user-someth...@mailhost.example.com? > >No, it

Re: [courier-users] Backup MX, was Courier::Filter rejecting over-zealously

Sam Varshavchik wrote at 7:07 AM (-0400) on 8/10/11: >> That's an interesting and clever approach. Would this properly pass >through >> ad hoc local-part extensions, e.g. for mail addressed to user- >> someth...@example.com -> user-someth...@mailhost.example.com? > >No, it wouldn't. Well, tha

Re: [courier-users] Backup MX, was Courier::Filter rejecting over-zealously

Ben Kennedy writes: >u...@example.com: u...@mailhost.example.com That's an interesting and clever approach. Would this properly pass through ad hoc local-part extensions, e.g. for mail addressed to user- someth...@example.com -> user-someth...@mailhost.example.com? No, it wouldn't. pg