Re: [courier-users] RFC 1035

2012-06-27 Thread Jan Ingvoldstad
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Lucio Crusca wrote: > Alessandro Vesely wrote: > > For example, Lucio's server could have matched the bad MX 20 > > of domain.com, unable to recognize its own IP address because it sits > > behind a NAT, and unable to recognize its own name since the DNS hid > >

Re: [courier-users] RFC 1035

2012-06-27 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Tue 26/Jun/2012 23:16:04 +0200 Lucio Crusca wrote: > Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> For example, Lucio's server could have matched the bad MX 20 >> of domain.com, unable to recognize its own IP address because it sits >> behind a NAT, and unable to recognize its own name since the DNS hid >> it. I

Re: [courier-users] RFC 1035

2012-06-27 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
>Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> For example, Lucio's server could have matched the bad MX 20 >> of domain.com, unable to recognize its own IP address because it sits >> behind a NAT, and unable to recognize its own name since the DNS hid >> it. If it had used the good MX record by default, it would h