> Someone else mentioned this last week. Reading the spec literally,
> it seems like the correct result code in this situation should be
> "unknown", and I'll make this change in the next version.
Which spec are you reading, Sam? Are you looking at RFC 4408 (http://
www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4408.t
On Sep 5, 2006, at 4:04 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> There's no point, whatsoever, in a pre-data hook. The only thing
> known at that time is the sender's IP and return address. The
> return address is meaningless. And there are already per-IP access
> controls.
The helo and recipient ar
On Sep 6, 2006, at 1:21 AM, Georg Lutz wrote:
> Hm. When I get it right, then localmailfilter is only applied when
> there
> is a local mailbox. And it seems to me that localmailfilter can only
> generate a permanent error or just let go through the recipient
> address.
>
> Are these assumptio
On Sep 5, 2006, at 11:36 AM, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
> Can a courier filter (courier-pythonbfilter, perlfilter, etc) be
> called BEFORE the DATA command is
> issued by a client?
We wrote our own "localfilter" to do that. The interface for a
localfilter is different from the interface
> Does anyone know of one or could share their esperiences and alias
> solution that I assume is solved with dot courier files. I'm
> assuming that they need to be created for each mailling list
> manually more or less like couriermlm but if not it would be
> great to find out.
We have about 60 M
On Jun 30, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
By the time rcptfilter/smtpfilter runs, that information is lost,
except as recorded in the Received: header.
I've been patching courieresmtpd.c to include the HELO and AUTH info
for over two years. (We run a custom rcptfilter that needs t
> 1. Compile and install courier-auth first
>
The "install" part of that is the first problem. There's a running
courier on both servers. And the older version of courier doesn't
want to play well with the newer authlib. (And the newer courier
obviously doesn't like the older authlib.) I'm n
I've tried building courier 0.53.2 on two different linux boxes
(gentoo and slackware) and gotten the same errors during make.
The errors are:
Linking courieresmtp
../../rfc2045/.libs/librfc2045.a(rfc2045rewrite.o)(.text+0x27): In
function `qpe_do':
/home/bill/system/courier/courier/courier-0
ne message is bounced and the other message skips passing
through the local filter. I looked at the code and I can't see any
relationship there, so it may be a coincidence. (Likely -- it's a
fairly busy mail server.)
Any thoughts on
I've been asked by my boss to append to all outgoing messages
a "corporate signature". ...
If I'm not wrong, there is no direct support for this in
Courier: has anybody come up with any clever workaround?
Consider all of the different email body types that your corporate
signature needs to deal wi
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 20:22, Robert Penz wrote:
where can I find a documentation of the control file. I currently know
only
that tags which are implemented in pythonfilter. I'm specially
searching
for a way to detect the mails which are sent via smtp auth, as I want
to
whitelist them.
D
On Aug 27, 2004, at 1:43 PM, Russell Premont wrote:
I need to setup dot-courier file to get mailman to work properly.
There are
different addresses for the different functions to be performed.
We've had mailman working for years on our server. We use an extremely
simple setup that only has a .cou
Norm Yates wrote:
I've configured -
locals
smtpaccess
esmtpd
esmtpacceptmailfor ?
DNS MX records ?
--Bill
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
I wrote:
I'm trying to get ldapaliasd working. When courier looks up an alias,
LDAP logs this immediately following the BIND:
RESULT tag=97 err=2 text=requested protocol version not allowed
Dawn breaks on Marblehead. ;-)
I realized I should probably be fiddling with the slapd.conf instead of
lda
I'm trying to get ldapaliasd working. When courier looks up an alias,
LDAP logs this immediately following the BIND:
RESULT tag=97 err=2 text=requested protocol version not allowed
I have authldap working without a problem. I duplicated the matching
settings to ldapaliasrc, so they *should* be d
After running fine for years, the esmtpd side of courier (0.42.2) is
suddenly choking. My users can get mail (pop3 and imap) but not send.
You can connect, but it never responds. Via telnet, sometimes it
responds after a minute or more. (mail.epackage.net if anyone wants to
test it)
I found the
After running fine for years, the esmtpd side of courier (0.42.2) is
suddenly choking. My users can get mail (pop3 and imap) but not send.
You can connect, but it never responds. Via telnet, sometimes it
responds after a minute or more. (mail.epackage.net if anyone wants to
test it)
I'd suspec
After running fine for years, the esmtpd side of courier (0.42.2) is
suddenly choking. My users can get mail (pop3 and imap) but not send.
You can connect, but it never responds. Via telnet, sometimes it
responds after a minute or more. (mail.epackage.net if anyone wants to
test it)
I'd suspec
Michael J Wise wrote:
Bill Schindler wrote:
Michael J Wise wrote:
Bill Schindler wrote:
Right click on the Trash folder under your IMAP account (the one
under
the account name, not the one at the top level).
It's
Not
There.
Just to be sure: I'm talking about right clicking
Michael J Wise wrote:
Bill Schindler wrote:
Right click on the Trash folder under your IMAP account (the one under
the account name, not the one at the top level).
It's
Not
There.
Just to be sure: I'm talking about right clicking in the drawer of
folders -- under In ->
On Wednesday, January 8, 2003, at 05:59 AM, Luisa Rodighieri wrote:
The problem is when I select to store sent messages and trash on the
server the messages are not sorted on the server and simply disappear.
Right click on the Trash folder under your IMAP account (the one under
the account na
The server is running Suse 8.0, courier is 0.40.1 built from source
with
authmysql support. Furthermore, I have checked that smtpaccess.dat gets
generated, that permissions are ok (I think, at least the file is
readable
for the courier user) and that the esmtpd startup script finds
smtpaccess.da
Zenon Panoussis wrote:
When delivering to an mbox, if the message didn't have a From_ line,
one will be manufactured. When delivering to a maildir, if the
message had a From_ line, it gets quietly deleted.
Currently courier delivers to mailman with aliases like
a-list:|/var/mailma
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Bill Schindler writes:
I've checked permissions and ownership up and down every directory
tree that seemed relevant. Everything seems to be okay.
I've tried restarting Courier. This problem seems to have something
to do with FAM, so it may be something glitc
This morning, all of our imap logins started generating the following
error in the logs:
imapd: Failed to create cache file: maildirwatch
imapd: Error: Input/output error
Can anyone tell me where its trying to create that file? From a quick
look at the source, I _think_ it's under the user's
On Friday, October 25, 2002, at 03:23 PM, Alexei wrote:
in esmpdacceptmailfor
localhost
happyalex.com
Shouldn't that be in a file in the esmtpacceptmailfor.dir directory?
(Such as esmtpacceptmailfor.dir/default)
And run courier/sbin/makeacceptmailfor -- which should create
esmtpacceptmailfo
On Friday, October 4, 2002, at 09:57 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> esmtpacceptmailfor.dir/mydomains:TRUCKINTHETRUCKEE.COM
> esmtpacceptmailfor.dir/mydomains:.TRUCKINTHETRUCKEE.COM
I don't remember if the domains in these files are case-sensitive, but
I've never seen anything other than lowerc
On Thursday, October 3, 2002, at 03:21 PM, cc wrote:
> Sam Varshavchik writes:
>> Probably because you did not enable ESMTP authentication in the
>> configuration file.
>
> Well I've just (re)read the INSTALL instructions and I don't see any
> mention of enabling or disabling it.
From the In
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 02:14 PM, Carlos Paz wrote:
> If I write a hosteddomains file like:
> mydomain.com
> mydomain.netmydomain.com
> The users work fine, but aliases don't. When I send a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] I get a "user_unknown" error.
It works here for rewriting hosts
On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, at 04:45 AM, Thomas von Hassel wrote:
> I'm trying to get virtual domains working. I have a working mysqlauth
> backend but i'm a bit unsure where to list the domains im recieving
> mail for.
>
> I have them listen in:
>
> hosteddomains
>
> and
>
> me
esmtpacc
On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 09:21 AM, Alexander Gretha wrote:
> hi, i'm trying to setup blacklists in courier and added the lines
>
> RBL='-block=blackholes.mail-abuse.org,BLOCK,"550 Rejected - see
> http://www.mail-abuse.org/rbl/";'
> RSS='-block=relays.mail-abuse.org,BLOCK,"550 Open sp
On Sunday, July 7, 2002, at 06:13 AM, Tony Bailey wrote:
> FROM: Aurel Schwarzentruber
> DATE: 07/05/2002 03:19:20
> SUBJECT: RE: [courier-users] Sluggish SMTP response
>
>> Tony Bailey wrote:
>>> The courier esmtp daemon on my server takes over a minute
>>> after connecting to respond with th
On Wednesday, July 3, 2002, at 03:35 PM, Daniel E. White wrote:
> I would LOVE to use ESMTP/Auth-SMTP, but I am on a Mac OS X machine.
> From all my research, it requires PAM, and that has to wait until
> 10.2 comes out some time in late summer -- like probably October.
If you look at the heade
On Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at 08:46 AM, Antony Dovgal wrote:
> Courier selects database, but doesn't issue SELECT statement (the
> name of
> database is written in the same way as table name).
Is there really no password set for root accessing mysql -- or did
you delete it before sending?
On Tuesday, June 25, 2002, at 11:06 AM, Antony Dovgal wrote:
> So ?
> Can anybody who have all this stuff working show configs ?
> Or there is no such people at all ?
Most likely, it is your config file that is in error. Showing you
our working config would only confuse you more, since it's
c
On Tuesday, June 4, 2002, at 02:00 AM, Alexei Batyr' wrote:
> OK, it's nice for spam fighting. However sometimes address from
> spam list
> could be placed to recipient list of normal message by accident.
Then it is not a spam trap email ID and should not be listed as
such. Spam trap email ID
You need to add -fno-common to the cc args.
On Wednesday, May 8, 2002, at 07:48 PM, Daniel E. White wrote:
> Here's one more thing I just stumbled upon:
>
> If I add rfc1035_res.o to the command line to compile testlookup,
> it compiles clean.
>
> So is the loader dropping the symbol or what ?
37 matches
Mail list logo
