On 7-Jun-2010, at 12:53, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> The current version of the script is using "formail" to get the Date:
> header and move the messages accourting to its config... As I have
> writen already it is I/O intensive and now I like to use a database for
> the messages which w
I generally archive my messages into monthly mailboxes, and then messages that
are more than a month old, I archive into a yearly mailbox. For example, this
message will go to the maildir .courier.2010-06.
Currently I am using my mail client to manually select messages in
courier.2010-04 and m
On 9-Mar-2010, at 16:32, Owen O' Shaughnessy wrote:
>
> DNSRBL lookups to zen.spamhaus.org weren't being answered, have taken
> it out of esmtpd and now mails are flowing again.
This usually happens if you are using something like OpenDNS (or even Google's
DNS servers) for DNS resolution.
Or if
On 9-Mar-2010, at 05:01, Bernd Wurst wrote:
>
> The three acronyms (that I know in this context) are
>
> MTA => mail transport agent
> MDA => mail delivery agent
> MUA => mail user agent
LDA -> Local Delivery Agent
An LDA (like procmail) accepts mail from the MDA and then writes it to the
final
I am interested in creating some .shared folders on my server, but when I try
to I anm told that I need to set the ACL to 'c'
OK, how/where?
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p11 and courier-imap-4.5.0,2
--
I HAVE NEITHER BEEN THERE NOR DONE THAT
Bart chalkboard Ep. AABF17
On 15-Jan-2010, at 05:12, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Boris Kunstleben writes:
>
>> Anyway, is it possible to limit the connections from one user?
>
> The MAXPERIP setting in the imapd configuration file sets the maximum number
> of connections accepted from the same IP address.
Yeah, that just do
On 6-Dec-2009, at 17:19, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> If you're sure this didn't happen as a result of restoring from backup,
> you should locate the mail logs for that message's ID and see if there's
> any info there.
Ah, yeah, I should have checked that. However, it looks to me like any other
mess
On 6-Dec-2009, at 15:01, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> For procmail, or anyone else, it is impossible to actually accomplish the
> task of delivering a message to a maildir unless the tmp and new
> subdirectories are actually touched. Scribbling something into their parent
> directory will have no ef
On 6-Dec-2009, at 13:53, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> LuKreme writes:
>
>> I am occasionally seeing duplicated files in my courier-IMAP folders.
>> Here's an example:
>> $ ls -nls 1260094560.39840_0*
>> 6 -rw--- 2 1004 1005 4780 Dec 6 03:16
>> 1
I am occasionally seeing duplicated files in my courier-IMAP folders. Here's
an example:
$ ls -nls 1260094560.39840_0*
6 -rw--- 2 1004 1005 4780 Dec 6 03:16
1260094560.39840_0.mail.covisp.net:2,
6 -rw--- 2 1004 1005 4780 Dec 6 03:16
1260094560.39840_0.mail.covisp.net:2,S
$
On Nov 18, 2009, at 19:32, Greg Earle wrote:
> The "procmail" being used is similarly old - v3.22 - and is also
> similarly locked down, sigh.)
I believe all procmails are similarly old.
Check the man pages for "LINEBUF". The default is 2048 I think, and
you probably need to increase it. Yo
On 17-Nov-2009, at 20:44, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> LuKreme writes:
>
>> I know dovecot has a command that returns the names of all the mailboxes
>> with new mail (and the counts, as I recall), but I'm not using dovecot.
>> Is there a simple way to query courier to
I know dovecot has a command that returns the names of all the mailboxes with
new mail (and the counts, as I recall), but I'm not using dovecot.
Is there a simple way to query courier to get this info or do I simply have to
query each individual mailbox?
--
'Never build a dungeon you wouldn't
On 30-Jun-2009, at 07:31, Simon Loewen wrote:
> * Additionally, certain popular IMAP mail clients are known to not
> work
> with the Courier mail server's IMAP server, due to an improper IMAP
> implementation by the mail client. *
Hmmm, that's surprising. I've never seen a IMAP mail client that
On 30-Apr-2009, at 18:13, Glenn R. Martin wrote:
> Does anyone know of a good mailing list software that integrates well
> with Courier? We are using PostgreSQL Virtual Accounts.
Mailman. Courier has its own, but I prefer mailman.
--
The Steve is seen, rightly or wrongly, as the visionary, the
On 16-Apr-2009, at 17:57, Mark Constable wrote:
> I'm using the Debian stable courier-mta 0.60.0-2 package and
> having trouble with this SPF record
> "v=spf1 mx:recruitasp.com,include:spf.messagelabs.com ~all"
That SPF record is invalid. Who told you commas were acceptable?
--
How do you feel?
On 5-Apr-2009, at 10:20, mattias wrote:
> I run freebsd and i not found the path
portinstall webmin
works here...
--
Beware of the Leopard!
--
___
courier-users mailing lis
On 27-Mar-2009, at 03:23, Markus Berger wrote:
> I would not try to dare asking for their server logs, since the
> person which
> sent the mail which we did not receive is a business partner, and it
> would
> be an unprofessional manner if I contact one of our investors asking
> for
> their m
On 27-Mar-2009, at 00:39, Jesper Langkjær wrote:
> The funny thing is that everything workede when it was running on
> Redhat 7.3, but after we installed the new server with Fedora 9 on
> it the vacation script stop working everything else runs fine.
Ah well, this is likely a chroot jail i
On 11-Mar-2009, at 08:12, cour...@thefreecat.org wrote:
> Either you live with it (I tell those who complain that their mail
> provider has a broken setup, not sure if I'm right there :-)) or
> you whitelist those domains (hotmail is one of them).
Yeah, their setup is not broken. As far as I
On 11-Mar-2009, at 05:13, Tim Lyth wrote:
> Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> LuKreme wrote:
>>
>>> On my system, about 18-20% of the grey listed email eventually
>>> gets delivered. Of the 20% that gets delivered, about 50% of that
>>> is spamt
On 10-Mar-2009, at 06:38, sergio wrote:
> I'm thinkig about change filter from spamassassin to greylist. Can you
> compare these two mudules?
Greylisting has nothing to do with spamassassin, and this is not an
either/or situation, just like RBLS are not a replacement for
spamassassin.
On my
On 4-Mar-2009, at 13:59, LuKreme wrote:
> On 4-Mar-2009, at 12:52, LuKreme wrote:
>> is anyone else getting these for every message they post:
>>
>>> Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered:
>>>
>>> :
>>> yocto.billmerria
On 4-Mar-2009, at 12:52, LuKreme wrote:
> is anyone else getting these for every message they post:
>
>> Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered:
>>
>> :
>> yocto.billmerriam.com [68.209.186.200]:
>>>>> STARTTLS
>> <<&
is anyone else getting these for every message they post:
> Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered:
>
> :
>yocto.billmerriam.com [68.209.186.200]:
STARTTLS
> <<< 500 couriertls: connect: Connection reset by peer
or am I just lucky?
--
I AM ZOMBOR! (kelly) ZOMBOR!
On 3-Mar-2009, at 07:56, Juan Miscaro wrote:
> # authpasswd md5
> Password:
> Reenter password:
> {MD5}FZJ9mrbqkyKbTyKlYWZOwQ==
Where is this authpasswd command? I don't have it on my system
courier-authlib-0.59.1 is in security/courier-authlib security/courier-
authlib
courier-authlib-base-0.5
What is the best way to create $HOME/Maildir/ for a user before I
start sorting all their old mbox files into the new folder?
Couriers Maildirs are a little different than the Maildirs that, for
example, maildirmake or procmail create. That is to say, at least the
top level mailbox contains
On 26-Feb-2009, at 20:48, LuKreme wrote:
> OK, I got authpam enabled and I can login to the IMAP server on SSL,
> but I can't do anything else.
Bah. Never mind, it is all working perfectly now. Courier needs its
own courier folders inside the top-level mbox, and I guess maildirmake
OK, I got authpam enabled and I can login to the IMAP server on SSL,
but I can't do anything else.
$ openssl s_client -connect mail.covisp.net:993
[ blah blah blah]
---
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UIDPLUS CHILDREN NAMESPACE
THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT QUOTA AUTH=CRAM-MD5
AUTH
On 25-Feb-2009, at 17:56, Jeff wrote:
> LuKreme wrote on 2009-Feb-26:
>> I want to move to a 100% courier setup, but courier is currently only
>> setup for mysql/virtual users. I thought the question "How do I
>> reconfigure courier to manage the local (/home/use
I have a sort of Frankenstein (Franken-STEEN :) setup where I have
shell users access their mail via uw-imap (unsecured) and everyone
else via Courier IMAP (secure only, self-signed cert). I want to move
to a 100% Courier setup.
my /usr/local/etc/courier-imap/imapd file has this in it:
ADDR
On 25-Feb-2009, at 17:25, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> LuKreme writes:
>
>> I have the following installed:
>> courier-authlib-0.59.1
>> courier-authlib-base-0.59.1
>> courier-authlib-mysql-0.59.1
>> courier-authlib-userdb-0.59.1
>> courier-authlib-vchkpw
[ sorry if this is doubled, the first one seems to have been eaten ]
I have a sort of Frankenstein (Franken-STEEN :) setup where I have
shell users access their mail via uw-imap (unsecured) and everyone
else via Courier IMAP (secure only, self-signed cert). I want to move
to a 100% Courier
On 25-Feb-2009, at 16:31, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Ricardo Kleemann writes:
>
>> « HTML content follows »
>> This is very strange... I noticed that I hadn't been receiving
>> messages from the list, and then looking at the mail log, to my
>> surprise I saw 2 occurrences of this: Feb 24 16
On 03 Feb 2006, at 15:22 , Sam Varshavchik wrote:
LuKreme writes:
When I try to connect to courier-ssl on port 993 to login, I get
the following.
(* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UIDPLUS CHILDREN NAMESPACE
THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT QUOTA AUTH=CRAM-MD5
AUTH=CRAM-SHA1 IDLE
When I try to connect to courier-ssl on port 993 to login, I get the
following.
(* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UIDPLUS CHILDREN NAMESPACE
THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES SORT QUOTA AUTH=CRAM-MD5
AUTH=CRAM-SHA1 IDLE AUTH=PLAIN ACL ACL2=UNION] Courier-IMAP ready.
Copyright 1998-2005 Do
36 matches
Mail list logo
