Re: [courier-users] Ports 465 vs 587

Hello. Am 14.08.2016 um 13:10 schrieb Mark Constable: > Because of arguments like this, and that I do not even want to offer > non-SSL options, I routinely disable ports 143 and 587 and only use > ports 993 and 465 for authenticated user mail... > https://www.agwa.name/blog/post/starttls_considere

Re: [courier-users] Ports 465 vs 587

On Sun 14/Aug/2016 13:10:22 +0200 Mark Constable wrote: > Because of arguments like this, and that I do not even want to offer > non-SSL options, I routinely disable ports 143 and 587 and only use > ports 993 and 465 for authenticated user mail... > > https://www.agwa.name/blog/post/starttls_consi

Re: [courier-users] Ports 465 vs 587

Mark Constable writes: Because of arguments like this, and that I do not even want to offer non-SSL options, I routinely disable ports 143 and 587 and only use ports 993 and 465 for authenticated user mail... https://www.agwa.name/blog/post/starttls_considered_harmful However just now I notice

[courier-users] Ports 465 vs 587

Because of arguments like this, and that I do not even want to offer non-SSL options, I routinely disable ports 143 and 587 and only use ports 993 and 465 for authenticated user mail... https://www.agwa.name/blog/post/starttls_considered_harmful However just now I notice this comment and am now c