[courier-users] Re: Increased error logging verbosity?

2002-05-29 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Peter C. Norton writes: > Yeah, that's why I only called it a hack. If I put bounds on it, > would you put it into courier? Yes -- I don't see a problem with that. -- Sam ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer

Re: [courier-users] Re: Increased error logging verbosity?

2002-05-29 Thread Peter C. Norton
Yeah, that's why I only called it a hack. If I put bounds on it, would you put it into courier? -Peter On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 06:07:14PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Peter C. Norton writes: > > >To answer my own question, a hack to do this is to change > >courier/module.local/deliver.c li

[courier-users] Re: Increased error logging verbosity?

2002-05-29 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Peter C. Norton writes: > To answer my own question, a hack to do this is to change > courier/module.local/deliver.c line 530: > >if ((delivf=fopen(p, "w")) == 0) >{ > sprintf(buf, "maildir.open %s:", p); > delivery_error(buf); >