Matt writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Matt writes:
List,
is there a runtime configuration directive to use in place of this?
I am using debian sarge so I dont normally compile courier and need
to increase the attachment size.
Not in the ancient version of sqwebmail you're using.
The
Jochen Antesberger wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 08.03.2006, 13:47 +1100 schrieb Matt:
I also build courier 0.52.2 for sarge (that is the version currently in
testing). I use it for my backup-mx because it suppresses backscatter.
I'm not to keen to pass that one on, however, because I see some
List,
is there a runtime configuration directive to use in place of this? I
am using debian sarge so I dont normally compile courier and need to
increase the attachment size.
thanks
-Matt
--
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by
Matt writes:
List,
is there a runtime configuration directive to use in place of this? I
am using debian sarge so I dont normally compile courier and need to
increase the attachment size.
Not in the ancient version of sqwebmail you're using.
The current version of sqwebmail can configure
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Matt writes:
List,
is there a runtime configuration directive to use in place of this?
I am using debian sarge so I dont normally compile courier and need
to increase the attachment size.
Not in the ancient version of sqwebmail you're using.
The current version of
Am Mittwoch, den 08.03.2006, 13:47 +1100 schrieb Matt:
is there a runtime configuration directive to use in place of this?
I am using debian sarge so I dont normally compile courier and
need
to increase the attachment size.
Not in the ancient version of sqwebmail you're using.
The
