On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 01:19:52AM +0100, Bill Michell wrote:
> Next problem; the spec file appears to require RPM version 4.0.2 or greater,
> while SuSE are still on 3.0.6-96, which doesn't seem to support
> Requires(post) - which is what the real problem with the /sbin/chkconfig
> line appears
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 01:23:38 +0100
"Bill Michell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#
#[Bill Michell] It is in the Requires(post) lines scattered liberally through
#the spec file. Actually, it seems to have been the first part of the line
#that was causing RPM to choke, not the second...
I see from you
--
Bill Michell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jesse
Keating
Sent: 18 July 2002 01:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Building RPMs again (was RE: [courier-users] Allow relay
from any IP if authenticated)
On Thu
--
Bill Michell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Juha Saarinen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 July 2002 01:04
To: Bill Michell
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Building RPMs again (was RE: [courier-users] Allow relay
from any IP if authenticated)
[snip]
Please trim
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 00:48:59 +0100
"Bill Michell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#
#Also, when it is recommended that building from RPMs should be done as
#non-root, it is strange that a file in /sbin should be referenced at all.
When does it mention /sbin? /sbin/chkconfig should only be done as a
Sent: 18 July 2002 00:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Building RPMs again (was RE: [courier-users] Allow relay
from any IP if authenticated)
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 00:21:25 +0100
"Bill Michell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#Then I start to hit problems - the faq doesn't make
July 2002 00:41
To: Bill Michell
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Building RPMs again (was RE: [courier-users] Allow relay
from any IP if authenticated)
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Bill Michell wrote:
> Not evil, perhaps, but not trivial.
>
> I'm trying to build the rpms for the
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 00:21:25 +0100
"Bill Michell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#Then I start to hit problems - the faq doesn't make clear exactly how you
#"use that spec file to build your RPMs" - I have successfully overwritten my
#changes now several times. Should I be using the -ta option to rpm
Not evil, perhaps, but not trivial.
I'm trying to build the rpms for the latest courier release version, on a
SUSE 7.2 system, following all the instructions I have managed to track down
so far...
I need to modify the install directories by editing the spec file because,
for example, the apache