On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:36:51AM -0500, Matt Barton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Peter C. Norton wrote:
>
> > > That makes sense. Any idea how to do a "reject" with a Cisco access
> > > list? As far as I know it's just accept or deny.
> >
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Peter C. Norton wrote:
> > That makes sense. Any idea how to do a "reject" with a Cisco access
> > list? As far as I know it's just accept or deny.
>
> If its only accept or drop, you can always let it through and let your
> mail
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 02:46:18PM -0500, Richard Geoffrion wrote:
> I thought reverse-dns lookups were done on port 53, but I could be wrong.
All dns queries go to port 53/udp, and rarely to 53/tcp. Not all
requests originate from port 53, tho.
--
The 5 year plan:
In five years we'll make up
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 03:55:27PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> That makes sense. Any idea how to do a "reject" with a Cisco access list?
> As far as I know it's just accept or deny.
If its only accept or drop, you can always let it through and let your
mail host reject it.
--
The 5 year plan:
uery?
Thanks,
Bowie
> -Original Message-
> From: Thorsten Schroeder [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:14 PM
> To: Bowie Bailey
> Cc: Courier-Users (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [courier-users] Connection to port 113
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue
- Original Message -
From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Courier-Users (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:01 PM
Subject: [courier-users] Connection to port 113
> I appreciate the quick response to my last question. Now I've got another
> one.
>
> Why
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Why is my mailserver trying to open a connection back to port 113 whenever I
> make an SMTP connection? I am not using any authentication. This is
> causing the SMTP connection to take about 30 seconds since my firewall is
> denying the connection
