David Niklas writes:
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:41:35 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> I think they're smart enough to understand how DNS works. I don't need
> to tell them that.
>
> I can't quite put my finger on why exactly I believe that this would be
> a waste of energy, trying to fight it. Cal
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:41:35 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> David Niklas writes:
>
> > On 03/10/2017(Fri) 15:35
> > > That's the other thing that the blacklists definitely don't want:
> > > excessi ve queries. Making two queries instead of one will put extra
> > > load on the blacklists, and sl
David Niklas writes:
On 03/10/2017(Fri) 15:35
> That's the other thing that the blacklists definitely don't want:
> excessi ve queries. Making two queries instead of one will put extra
> load on the blacklists, and slow down your mail delivery.
Well isn't that what they want, two quires instead
>On 03/10/2017(Fri) 15:35
>Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> SZÉPE Viktor writes:
>>
>> > Idézem/Quoting Sam Varshavchik :
>> >
>> > > In the long run this will be counterproductive, since the existing
>> > > blacklists will now result in a generic "Access denied." bounces,
>> > > instead of the blacklist
On 03/10/2017(Fri) 15:35
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> SZÉPE Viktor writes:
>
> > Idézem/Quoting Sam Varshavchik :
> >
> > > In the long run this will be counterproductive, since the existing
> > > blacklists will now result in a generic "Access denied." bounces,
> > > instead of the blacklist-provi
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>Is it worth considering A and TXT record lookups rather than ANY, given
>the request to stop sending requests for ANY result? Might that request
>indicate that requests for ANY will not be supported in the future?
I got angry in the past at cloudflare for the st
On 10.03.17 10:51, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>I was checking the RBL queries and answers on a server this morning,
>when I noticed this in the responses:
> Please stop asking for ANY.See draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any
>
>Both spamhaus and abuseat provide this text in their replies to
>Courier's RBL lo
On Fri 10/Mar/2017 21:00:23 +0100 SZÉPE Viktor wrote:
> Idézem/Quoting Sam Varshavchik :
>> Gordon Messmer writes:
>>
>>> I was checking the RBL queries and answers on a server this morning,
>>> when I noticed this in the responses:
>>> Please stop asking for ANY.See draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any
SZÉPE Viktor writes:
Idézem/Quoting Sam Varshavchik :
> In the long run this will be counterproductive, since the existing
> blacklists will now result in a generic "Access denied." bounces,
> instead of the blacklist-provided message that will point back to
> the blacklist. But, it's their dec
Idézem/Quoting Sam Varshavchik :
> Gordon Messmer writes:
>
>> I was checking the RBL queries and answers on a server this morning,
>> when I noticed this in the responses:
>> Please stop asking for ANY.See draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any
>>
>> Both spamhaus and abuseat provide this text in their
Gordon Messmer writes:
I was checking the RBL queries and answers on a server this morning,
when I noticed this in the responses:
Please stop asking for ANY.See draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any
Both spamhaus and abuseat provide this text in their replies to
Courier's RBL lookups.
Is it worth c
On 03/10/2017 11:00 AM, SZÉPE Viktor wrote:
> CloudFlare is also retiring ANY queries.
>
> https://blog.cloudflare.com/deprecating-dns-any-meta-query-type/
"We aware of only two programs that issue ANY queries:
Un-patched versions qmaild..."
I laughed at that one. :)
--
CloudFlare is also retiring ANY queries.
https://blog.cloudflare.com/deprecating-dns-any-meta-query-type/
Idézem/Quoting Gordon Messmer :
> I was checking the RBL queries and answers on a server this morning,
> when I noticed this in the responses:
> Please stop asking for ANY.See draft-ie
13 matches
Mail list logo