This behavioral discussion translates well to the physical realm. In
architecture, accessibility is a legal term and is about barrier-free design,
to allow disabled bodies of all types to use the space as with anyone else.
The converse is inclusive design, which also translates well back to beh
>
> The two go hand in hand. Being open, but not accessible does little good
> because people can't take advantage of the openness. Being accessible but
> not open is just rude.
I think this is a very keen observation, and quite right.
The key context for *open* when it was being attributed as
As follow up to my original post, I'm hoping some who have been doing this
coworking bit longer than I can also clarify what was meant when those
values were identified.
On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 1:10:47 PM UTC-4, Julia Ferguson wrote:
>
> Hello all.
>
> We're updating our website, which
3 matches
Mail list logo
