Re: FAIL IO-Multiplex-1.05 sun4-solaris 2.8

2003-07-29 Thread Rob Brown
So which $! is it? I've added some verbose spewage to 200_udp.t and built a test tarball for you: http://freeware.roobik.com/iomultiplex/IO-Multiplex-1.07.tar.gz It doesn't fix or change anything, but it shows exactly why it fails. Would it be possible to run this tarball through your CPANPLUS?

Re: FAIL Net-Ping-2.28 i386-freebsd-64int 4.6-stable

2003-02-10 Thread Rob Brown
Yeah, Net::Ping is one of those modules that it is really good to have network connectivity to test it. Actually, that is Net::Ping's entire purpose, to determine reachabilty of a remote host across a network. I felt it was appropriate to test this functionality within the "make test". Plug in yo

FAIL Net-FTPServer-1.113 i586-linux 2.2.16c32_iii

2003-01-16 Thread Rob Brown
Sorry about those failures. I fixed 150commands and a race condition in 400sighup for version 1.114. It's already posted to CPAN. Can you try again? Thanks, Rob -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:09:51 +0100 From: Jeroen Latour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROT

Cygwin nonblocking tcp connect Net::Ping bug

2003-01-10 Thread Rob Brown
oblem. Net::Ping 2.27 should have this fixed. On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > On Fri 10 Jan 2003 01:31, Rob Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm getting a bit frustrated since I still have > > not been able to duplicate your Cygwin issues. > > How do

Re: ftpserver: [jlatour@www.arens.nl: FAIL Net-FTPServer-1.112 i586-linux 2.2.16c32_iii]

2003-01-03 Thread Rob Brown
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 02:30:18PM +, Ben Wheeler wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 02:09:22PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I can't see what the fundamental problem is here, except that his > > > installation of Net::FTPServer is totally f

Re: Net-Ping v2.26

2002-12-17 Thread Rob Brown
lib' Characteristics of this binary (from libperl): Compile-time options: MULTIPLICITY USE_LARGE_FILES PERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT Built under cygwin Compiled at Aug 22 2001 01:05:05 @INC: /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/cygwin-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/cygwin

Re: FAIL Net-Ping-2.25 sun4-solaris-thread-multi-64int 2.9

2002-12-11 Thread Rob Brown
+ 1.03 csys = 9.42 CPU) > > I've also added port 80 to my services file. It's a default Solaris 9 > services file, don't know why Sun hasn't added those. > > Thanks for the quick fix, > > N. > > Rob Brown wrote: > > >Mr Super: >

Re: FAIL Net-Ping-2.25 sun4-solaris-thread-multi-64int 2.9

2002-12-11 Thread Rob Brown
Mr Super: Thank you for your report. I think I might be able to fix it. Can you try version 2.26 on your solaris box? It is in CVS: cvs -z3 -q -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/cvsroot/freeware checkout Net-Ping cd Net-Ping perl Makefile.PL make make test If it passes okay, I'll post

Cygwin-1.3.16-1 O_NONBLOCK tcp connect EAGAIN bug

2002-12-02 Thread Rob Brown
t it to CPAN. Thanks! -- Rob On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > On Wed 27 Nov 2002 21:30, Rob Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You don't need any special "-Ilib" or anything since it is not a test on > > Net::Ping > > I think I /do/ n

Re: FAIL Net-Ping-2.25 sun4-solaris 2.8

2002-11-20 Thread Rob Brown
er (not even on localhost). But I do assume the sites tested do not block (firewall) tcp port 80. -- Rob On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Jost Krieger wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 04:13:20PM -0700, Rob Brown wrote: > > Ugh, you're killing me. You don't get the > > proper "Connect

Net::Ping Solaris bugs

2002-11-20 Thread Rob Brown
Wow, this is closer, but Solaris still seems to be breaking. I've attached a simple script with much verbosity. It follows the basic flow of what is breaking on Solaris. Here is what I get on my box: --- snip --- [rob@skip rob]$ time perl nonblock.pl 1037815503 A:(111)Connection refused at nonb

Re: FAIL Net-Ping-2.25 sun4-solaris 2.8

2002-11-19 Thread Rob Brown
Ugh, you're killing me. You don't get the proper "Connection refused" error when trying to connect to localhost? Try this on the Solaris box: $ telnet 127.0.0.1 12345 Trying 127.0.0.1... telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused $ telnet 127.0.0.1 12346 Trying 127.0.0.1... tel

[cpan #1697] 450_service.t

2002-10-21 Thread Rob Brown
Wow, this seems nastier than I was hoping. I didn't think about the dual CPU boxes and such that could cause a non-blocking connect to really connect or return the error code immediately. I also still think that it COULD be a matter of Fcntl because when I comment out this section: $ grep -2 fcn

Re: Net::Ping 2.23 t/450_service.t

2002-10-21 Thread Rob Brown
ok G4 box to test it on. Also thanks to Dan the Man for the most helpful feedback. Rob Brown CPANID: BBB -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 20:57:29 +0900 From: Dan Kogai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Rob Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Perl 5 Porters <[EMAIL PR

Re: Net::Ping patches

2002-10-14 Thread Rob Brown
tes[,$device); This may not fix your "wauna" bug all the way, but it should still be helpful for those multi-homed boxes that can't figure out which is the best network device. If I don't hear about any problems or warn spewages, I'll assume it's okay to PAUSE it

Net::Ping on perl 5.8.0 RC1

2002-07-02 Thread Rob Brown
Okay, I ripped most of the constants stuff out of WriteMakefile. This should work on perl 5.005, 5.6.0, 5.6.1, 5.7.3, and hopefully 5.8.0 now. It would be nice to see it using Dyck's MakeMaker 6.00 or 6.01 as well as Jarkko's version at 6.03. cvs -z3 -q -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/

RE: FAIL Net-Ping-2.18 i386-linux 2.4.8-11mdkenterprise

2002-06-30 Thread Rob Brown
address. Is there a way you could test Net::Ping on a machine that has a regular internet connection instead of that XP gateway stuff? I don't think WinBlowz was ever designed to be a router. :-) Rob Brown CPANID: BBB On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, Robert Creager wrote: > > You asked for it:

Re: Net::Ping patches

2002-06-20 Thread Rob Brown
R NOT. Thanks, Rob Brown CPANID: BBB On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > Hi, here is a patch I have forgotten to pass on to you: portability > patches for Perl 5.8.0-to-be: > > - raw socket require privileged user on Win2k > - Mac OS Classic has no ICMP support &g

Re: FAIL Net-Ping-2.18 i386-linux 2.4.8-11mdkenterprise

2002-06-13 Thread Rob Brown
vsroot/freeware co Net-Ping cd Net-Ping perl Makefile.PL make make disttest If you get "All tests successful" then, I'll PAUSE to to cpan. Thanks for your time! Rob Brown -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 15:32:41 -0600 (MDT) From: Automated Perl

Re: FAIL IO-Multiplex-1.03 i386-freebsd-thread-multi4.6-prerelease-20020516-jpsnap

2002-06-07 Thread Rob Brown
:11:15PM -0600, Rob Brown wrote: > > I've never seen this error before. Would you mind taking a bit > > of time to try a "make test" on the latest source tree in cvs? > > cvs -q -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/cvsroot/freeware co >IO-Multiplex > &

Re: FAIL IO-Multiplex-1.03 i386-freebsd-thread-multi4.6-prerelease-20020516-jpsnap

2002-06-07 Thread Rob Brown
smokestack: I've never seen this error before. Would you mind taking a bit of time to try a "make test" on the latest source tree in cvs? cvs -q -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/cvsroot/freeware co IO-Multiplex Some of the timeout bugs have been optimized. -- Rob On Sat, 8 Jun 2002

Re: FAIL File::NFSLock sun4-solaris 2.8

2002-06-07 Thread Rob Brown
there are any fails on the CPAN version. I tested 1.16 on a Solaris 2.6 (perl 5.004) x86 machine and finally got it to pass, but I don't have a more current box. -- Rob CPANID: BBB On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Alex Muntada wrote: > Quoting Rob Brown: > > > Okay, this should work. Can

Re: FAIL File::NFSLock sun4-solaris 2.8

2002-06-05 Thread Rob Brown
Jost, Okay, this should work. Can you update and try the "perl Makefile.PL ; make ; make test" again. I'll PAUSE her if it passes for you on solaris. -- Rob On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Jost Krieger wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 06:14:41PM -0600, Rob Brown wrote: > >

Re: FAIL File-NFSLock-1.13 sun4-solaris 2.8

2002-05-31 Thread Rob Brown
make ; make test What is the output or what does CPANPLUS say? I guess I want more details if possible. Thanks, Rob Brown On 31 May 2002, Josts Smokehouse wrote: > This distribution has been tested as part of the cpan-testers > effort to test as many new uploads to CPAN as possible.

Wrong IO::Multiplex version

2002-05-23 Thread Rob Brown
ontrol should be changed to someone that is willing to take over. Can [EMAIL PROTECTED] help? Rob Brown CPANID: BBB PS: I have IO::Multiplex in my CVS server if you'd like to checkout the latest source or verify the history logs or provide patches or whatever: cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTEC

2.4.8-11mdkenterprise: FAIL Net::Ping 2.18

2002-05-16 Thread Rob Brown
=i386-linux uname='linux no.mandrakesoft.com 2.4.8-11mdkenterprise #1 smp wed aug 22 16:05:18 cest 2001 i686 unknown ' Try this: [perl_test@chaos Net-Ping-2.18]$ telnet 10.12.14.16 80 I need the entire error output please. Rob Brown CPANID: BBB On Sun, 12 May 2002, Automated

Re: Net::Ping 2.07

2001-12-04 Thread Rob Brown
ing about your private network, but I figured the likelyhood is just very small. This is just supposed to be for most standard systems. Do you know of a better valid IP address that is always gauranteed to not be routeable? Thanks, Rob Brown CPANID: BBB On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Oliver Paukstadt wro

Net::Ping 2.07

2001-12-03 Thread Rob Brown
Blowz for you too. It should now work with UNIX and Win32 OS and with Perl versions 5.005xx, 5.6.x, 5.7.x. I think it should be ready for 5.8.x soon if not already. Sorry for the problems. Rob Brown CPAN ID: BBB

Re: UNKNOWN Net-Ping-2.03 i686-linux 2.2.14-5.0

2001-11-18 Thread Rob Brown
before uploading. (duh!) Hey thanks for all your time you take in testing this stuff. You guys are awesome. Rob Brown CPANID: BBB On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Jonathan Stowe wrote: > On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Rob Brown wrote: > > > It never had a test suite or Readme or Changes file > >

Re: UNKNOWN Net-Ping-2.03 i686-linux 2.2.14-5.0

2001-11-16 Thread Rob Brown
It never had a test suite or Readme or Changes file before, and it has been there since 1996. I went ahead and created them and uploaded a new tarball. Some of the tests require network connectivity. Let me know if you have any problems. Sorry for any troubles. Good luck! Rob Brown CPANID

Re: FAIL B/BB/BBB/Getopt-GetArgs-1.01.tar.gz sun4-solaris 2.8

2001-06-07 Thread Rob Brown
You are right. I'm so sorry. I only had 15 minutes to create and prepare that module and upload it because it was a dependancy for another module to be uploaded. I uploaded a (hopefully) fixed version 1.02 to CPAN. Is that okay? I've never had to do this before so it's all new for me. Rob On