UNKNOWN result on test which totally failed compilation - is that right?

2008-09-25 Thread Martin J. Evans
Hi, Here http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2008/09/msg2285905.html you will find a submitted test result of UNKNOWN which totally failed compilation. Is that right? Would you not normally class this as a FAIL? BTW, the reason it fails compilation is that it is strawberry perl,

Re: UNKNOWN result on test which totally failed compilation - is that right?

2008-09-25 Thread David Golden
Hi, Martin. There was a recent policy change on grades -- FAIL is now *only* for actual test failures. Build failures are graded 'UNKNOWN'. Some authors had complained that it's hard to differentiate between actual test failures and build failures that might simply be due to a poorly configured

Re: Fwd: Please check your CPAN Testers configuration

2008-09-25 Thread David Cantrell
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 09:48:46AM -0400, David Golden wrote: I've forwarded a sample message below that I propose to use for my promised CPAN Testers Nagbot. (Apologies to Chris for using him as an example.) ... there is a cooldown period during which no additional emails will

cannot understand why dependency test fails

2008-09-25 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hello In the following report: http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2289062 Test fails because of a problem: [MSG] [Wed Sep 24 11:48:02 2008] Sending test report for 'Tree-DAG_Node-1.06' [MSG] [Wed Sep 24 11:48:02 2008] Ok, not sending test report [MSG] [Wed Sep 24 11:48:02 2008]

Re: cannot understand why dependency test fails

2008-09-25 Thread Chris 'BinGOs' Williams
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:35:45AM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: Hello In the following report: http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2289062 Test fails because of a problem: [MSG] [Wed Sep 24 11:48:02 2008] Sending test report for 'Tree-DAG_Node-1.06' [MSG] [Wed Sep 24