Hi,
CPANPLUS-YACSmoke-0.14 should be hitting the CPAN mirrors as we speak.
The one major change is in CPANPLUS::Dist::YACSmoke
It now filters for cases where the report is not graded as a PASS and
it appears that a prereq has been excluded for whatever reason. If so
the report will be discarded
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:13:14PM -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> # from Eric Wilhelm
> # on Sunday 28 September 2008:
>
> ># from Dmitry Karasik
> ># on Sunday 28 September 2008:
> >
> >>> Would it be enough to just add the distribution directory itself to
> >>> PERL5LIB? That has some risk of pol
# from Eric Wilhelm
# on Sunday 28 September 2008:
># from Dmitry Karasik
># on Sunday 28 September 2008:
>
>>> Would it be enough to just add the distribution directory itself to
>>> PERL5LIB? That has some risk of polluting @INC in a way that could
>>> cause problems -- but I think the risk is
# from Dmitry Karasik
# on Sunday 28 September 2008:
>> Would it be enough to just add the distribution directory itself to
>> PERL5LIB? That has some risk of polluting @INC in a way that could
>> cause problems -- but I think the risk is low.
>
>In Prima's case that should work, but it won't in
> Would it be enough to just add the distribution directory itself to
> PERL5LIB? That has some risk of polluting @INC in a way that could
> cause problems -- but I think the risk is low.
In Prima's case that should work, but it won't in general case.
--
Sincerely,
Dmitry Karasik
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 3:44 AM, Dmitry Karasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Prima::noX11 is a part of Prima. It is not found because CPANPLUS
>> > apparently doesn't execute "make install", but relies on hacking
>> > $ENV{PERL5LIB}. This doesn't work for Prima, because its build
>> > process is
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Dmitry Karasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's an overkill, I think. I also received lots of PASS, which means that
> automated testing works more ofthen than not. I only started receiving fails
> generated by YACSmoke, and by YACSmoke only. I suppose there are
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was tired last night ( just you wait ;) ) and failed completely to include
> the link to the test reports:
>
> http://www.cpantesters.org/show/CPAN-Test-Dummy-Perl5-Build-Fails.html
>
> These have been consisten
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 09:43:01AM +0200, Dmitry Karasik wrote:
> > Both CPAN and CPANPLUS manipulate PERL5LIB for non-install testing.
> >
> > So you may actually be better off just avoiding automated testing entirely:
> >
> > exit if $ENV{AUTOMATED_TESTING}
>
> That's an overkill, I think. I
> >Prima::noX11 is a part of Prima. It is not found because CPANPLUS
> > apparently doesn't execute "make install", but relies on hacking
> > $ENV{PERL5LIB}. This doesn't work for Prima, because its build
> > process is not based on populating ./blib.
>
> That's special. Seems like a patch to its
> Both CPAN and CPANPLUS manipulate PERL5LIB for non-install testing.
>
> So you may actually be better off just avoiding automated testing entirely:
>
> exit if $ENV{AUTOMATED_TESTING}
That's an overkill, I think. I also received lots of PASS, which means that
automated testing works more oft
11 matches
Mail list logo
