Re: CPANPLUS::Dist::Build 0.44 considered harmful

2009-12-16 Thread Chris 'BinGOs' Williams
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 03:28:54PM -0700, p...@0ne.us wrote: Hello, Thanks for warning us about this! I quickly looked at some of the reports and I can tell you with confidence that a lot of my FAIL reports is bad. I don't think it's CP:D:B's fault but the VM's fault. It seems like

Crucial factor NTP management (Was: CPANPLUS::Dist::Build 0.44 considered harmful)

2009-12-16 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:14:40 +, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams ch...@bingosnet.co.uk said: Regarding the email subject, as far as I can tell from the reports I looked through they were all relating to time issues with Makefile, CP::D::Build wouldn't be involved CP::D::MM would. Sorry

Re: CPANPLUS::Dist::Build 0.44 considered harmful

2009-12-16 Thread Graham TerMarsch
On December 15, 2009, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: Evidence is rather strong to me that CPANPLUS::Dist::Build 0.44 is producing bad reports. Several of my statistics indicate that CPANPLUS::Dist::Build=0.44 never produces PASS reports and instead produces many false FAIL reports.

Re: Crucial factor NTP management (Was: CPANPLUS::Dist::Build 0.44 considered harmful)

2009-12-16 Thread p...@0ne.us
Andreas J. Koenig wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:14:40 +, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams ch...@bingosnet.co.uk said: Regarding the email subject, as far as I can tell from the reports I looked through they were all relating to time issues with Makefile, CP::D::Build wouldn't