On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 03:28:54PM -0700, p...@0ne.us wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for warning us about this! I quickly looked at some of the
reports and I can tell you with confidence that a lot of my FAIL reports
is bad. I don't think it's CP:D:B's fault but the VM's fault. It seems
like
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:14:40 +, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams
ch...@bingosnet.co.uk said:
Regarding the email subject, as far as I can tell from the reports I looked
through they
were all relating to time issues with Makefile, CP::D::Build wouldn't be
involved
CP::D::MM would.
Sorry
On December 15, 2009, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
Evidence is rather strong to me that CPANPLUS::Dist::Build 0.44 is
producing bad reports.
Several of my statistics indicate that CPANPLUS::Dist::Build=0.44 never
produces PASS reports and instead produces many false FAIL reports.
Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:14:40 +, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams
ch...@bingosnet.co.uk said:
Regarding the email subject, as far as I can tell from the reports I looked
through they
were all relating to time issues with Makefile, CP::D::Build wouldn't