[Quoting Chris 'BinGOs' Williams, on January 23 2010, 08:06, in Re: CPAN
Testers Dai]
There was a flaw in my previous logic which I have actually tested
this time against EekBoek.
Did you use 1.04.06 for testing? 1.04.06.01 has been upgraded to
contain M::B 0.32.
-- Johan
On a related topic...
I sync my CPAN with cpantesters, and I noticed that in
modules/by-module/Module there's M::B 0.2804 through 0.32 .
(All Ken's and Eric's)
In authors/id/D/DA/DAGOLDEN there's M::B 0.33_01 through 0.3603 .
Shouldn't the newer versions also be in modules/by-module/Module ?
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:06:22PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
On a related topic...
I sync my CPAN with cpantesters, and I noticed that in
modules/by-module/Module there's M::B 0.2804 through 0.32 .
(All Ken's and Eric's)
In authors/id/D/DA/DAGOLDEN there's M::B 0.33_01 through 0.3603 .
Hi Torsten,
for my question please direct me to it.
Today I got a FAIL report for MMapDB 0.06:
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2010/01/msg6715055.html
The module requires File::Map=0.16. The testing system claims to have 0.20.
So, it probably should work.
How
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:35:05AM +, Barbie wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:06:22PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
On a related topic...
I sync my CPAN with cpantesters, and I noticed that in
modules/by-module/Module there's M::B 0.2804 through 0.32 .
(All Ken's and Eric's)
In
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:51:34AM +, Barbie wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:35:05AM +, Barbie wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:06:22PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
On a related topic...
I sync my CPAN with cpantesters, and I noticed that in
modules/by-module/Module
Hi there.
Some modules uses Test::Perl::Critic tests outside of author environment, that can result in FAIL because some installed
Perl::Critic::Policy'ies are violated. Once I've seen a policy that contradicts to one of default policies, leading test
to failure every time when policy subject
Nothing in http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?Test::Perl::Critic says that
the module is supposed to be used in an author environment only.
That's totally not true. I made a mistake, apologies.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:06:46 +, Barbie bar...@missbarbell.co.uk
said:
but /modules only has:
-rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 1294 2010-01-25 11:53 modules/RECENT-1d.yaml
-rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 910 2010-01-25 11:53 modules/RECENT-1h.yaml
-rw-r--r-- 1 barbie users 1291 2010-01-25
