Hi folks... While Net::TDMA is not the worlds most fabulous module (and in
fact its test coverage is probably less than 1%), all your failures were
"out of memory." I test at home on a 64-bit Snow Leopard Server Mac with
20gb of ram and untold terabytes of disk. The module is intended to
*teach*people how to work with TDMA, how the protocol works, and so
on. I can
create a new test, t/00_memory.t or something, to indicate whether this is
going to work at all, but the thing is, in order to test an entire TDMA
"Day", we have to *construct* one. If the user hasn't got the juice, it's
not going to work real well.

Here's a test from mine:

number of cores available:  8
users on system:       12
system load averages:   0.18 0.28 0.15
distinct processes on system:      106
actual cpu idle percentage: 1

thunder:Net-TDMA-0.1pre alex$ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e"
"test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/00_day....ok 1/0

This may take a while.
# Your first test, with specified parameters, took 39 seconds.

This, too, may take a while.
t/00_day....ok 8/0# The arbitrarily constructed day took 45 seconds to
complete.
# Nominally this would take place in 1/32 of a second, or .031s.
# Which is why /usr/bin/perl is probably not fast enough for this.
t/00_day....ok

All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=9, 90 wallclock secs (82.83 cusr +  7.31 csys = 90.14 CPU)
thunder:Net-TDMA-0.1pre alex$



--
Alex J Avriette
http://www.spunfr.com/ (Harder Better Faster Stronger)
http://www.linkedin.com/in/avriette  (+1 858 3677293)



On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:29 PM, CPAN Tester Report Server <
do_not_re...@cpantesters.org> wrote:

> Dear Alex J. Avriette,
>
> Please find below the latest reports for your distributions, generated by
> CPAN Testers, from the last 24 hours.
>
> To set your preferences for what you wish to have reported in this Daily
> Summary, please visit the CPAN Testers Preferences system at
> https://prefs.cpantesters.org.
>
>
> Net-TDMA-0.1pre:
> - IP35-irix-64int / 5.8.8:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7031347
>
> - alpha-netbsd / 5.10.0:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7033635
>
> - darwin-thread-multi-2level / 5.10.1:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7031357
>
> - i386-freebsd / 5.10.1:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7025754
>
> - i386-freebsd-thread-multi / 5.10.1:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7031307
>
> - i86pc-solaris-64int / 5.10.1:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7028046
>
> - i86pc-solaris-64int / 5.11.5:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7028169
>
> - x86_64-linux-thread-multi / 5.11.5:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7030785
>
> - x86_64-linux-thread-multi / 5.8.9:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7030798
>
> - x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld / 5.11.5:
>  - FAIL http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7025605
>
>
>
> If you have an issue with a particular report, or wish to gain further
> information from the tester, please use the 'Find A Tester' tool at
> http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html, using the NNTP ID of the
> report to locate the correct email address.
>
> If you wish to unsubscribe from these notifications, please login to the
> CPAN Testers Preferences system, with your PAUSE credentials, and disable
> CPAN Testers notifications permanently or temporarily. If you have problems
> with accessing the site, please contact Barbie <bar...@cpan.org> and
> request to be removed from the automatic mailings.
>
> Thanks,
> The CPAN Testers
> --
> Reports:     http://www.cpantesters.org
> Statistics:  http://stats.cpantesters.org
> Wiki:        http://wiki.cpantesters.org
> Preferences: https://prefs.cpantesters.org
>

Reply via email to