Re: [rt.cpan.org #104607] incorrect case

gt; depends on Test::POD. Correct is Test::Pod. > > However, the distribution should not have a dependency on this module at > all. Pod tests should not run for normal user installs - either move the > test to xt/, or guard it with: > > plan skip_all => 'These tests are for authors only!' unless > $ENV{AUTHOR_TESTING} or $ENV{RELEASE_TESTING}; > > > -- David Oswald daosw...@gmail.com

Re: CPAN Tester report does not include build output, nor verbose test output from failures

With cpantesters I have an automated build system that tells me my stuff > is > > broken, but does not give me the details I need to fix it, and when I ask > > for them apparently it is too much bother for the person running the > tests > > to actually supply what I asked. > > I've found most testers are pretty responsive to a request to provided > detailed output to help diagnose an unusual failure. > > -- > David Golden Twitter/IRC: @xdg > -- David Oswald daosw...@gmail.com

Re: cpantesters system setting AUTHOR_TESTING=1

ng report is useless. >> >> e.g. in the report I reference above, all the tests fail because there is >> an additional module loaded when AUTHOR_TESTING=1, which is in develop >> prereqs but you have failed to install it. >> >> thanks, >> Karen Etheridge >> et...@cpan.org > > -Nigel -- David Oswald daosw...@gmail.com

Is this tester configured incorrectly?

of "UNKNOWN" reports from this smoker recently. -- David Oswald daosw...@gmail.com dav...@cpan.org

Re: Request for help understanding a FAIL

e individual running that smoker, or if it's a lost cause. On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Christian Walde wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 04:53:21 +0100, David Oswald wrote: > >> The FAIL I'm having trouble understanding is this report for >> Bytes::Random::Secure:

Request for help understanding a FAIL

ker, and shows that Crypt::Random::Seed did install properly. Is this a smoker misconfiguration? Or have I missed something in Bytes::Random::Secure? Thanks in advance, Dave -- David Oswald daosw...@gmail.com dav...@cpan.org

Perl 5.6.x smokers (Bytes::Random::Secure)

rl 5.6. I believe we've established 5.6 compatibility as of Bytes::Random::Secure version 0.20 and newer. So the question is: Is this a case of "Patience is a virtue", or of "You forgot to XYZ."? Thanks! Dave -- David Oswald daosw...@gmail.com dav...@cpan.org

Re: smoking with 5.15, 5.13

st is run against old versions of Perl? > That way each tester won't have to maintain an entry in their > distroprefs. We can exclude in a central location. -- David Oswald daosw...@gmail.com

Re: Testing on IO::Prompt::Hooked

sages, why http://static.cpantesters.org/distro/I/IO-Prompt-Hooked.html still shows no tests for v0.05. Is http://cpantesters.org experiencing difficulties at the moment? Dave -- David Oswald daosw...@gmail.com dav...@cpan.org

Re: Testing on IO::Prompt::Hooked

.0 > End of Lastlog > > I only excluded it on my SOlaris smoker as it was killing the vm Was IO::Prompt::Hooked v0.05 also a problem for your Solaris smoker? I think that as of 0.05 the issue should be resolved for any platform that is IO::Prompt::Tiny friendly. -- David Oswald daosw...@gmail.com dav...@cpan.org

Testing on IO::Prompt::Hooked

at smoke testing has ground to a halt is there anything I can do to help? ;) Dave -- David Oswald daosw...@gmail.com

A bogus version of Test has been uploaded to CPAN.

I'm not sure whether that would be enough of a hint to the various cpan installers to shift from one author's dist. to another. Dave -- David Oswald daosw...@gmail.com

Recent substantial increase in smoke test failures for Inline::CPP (Unable to locate Parse::RecDescent dependency)

ters? Could it instead be a recent change to CPANPLUS? Where do I go from here in resolving the problem? Thanks for your time, Dave -- David Oswald daosw...@gmail.com dav...@cpan.org davido on PerlMonks