Dear CPAN Testers,
You may or may not realize that Barbie has done a tremendous amount of
work over the years to reconcile email addresses to individual
testers.
As we move to CT 2.0, every testers will have a "Metabase profile" --
a JSON file containing identify information and a shared secret -
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:07:30PM -0400, David Golden wrote:
>
> You may, of course, generate new profiles for any particular need you
> have, but there is no plan as of yet to allow people to easily merge
> merge profiles for the purposes of the CPAN Testers statistics (e.g.
> the Leaderboard).
David Golden writes:
> If you have trouble getting your profile, please check your spam traps
> for email from "Metabase Admin" . If
> you still have trouble, please email this list (or me directly) with
> details.
Indeed, 1und1 (a popular German provider) flags the mail as spam. I
cannot reall
If you have trouble getting your profile, please check your spam traps
for email from "Metabase Admin" . If
you still have trouble, please email this list (or me directly) with
details.
Indeed, 1und1 (a popular German provider) flags the mail as spam. I
cannot really recognize from the mail hea
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Nigel Horne wrote:
> Mails being directed to spam folders can often be fixed by enabling SPF and
> DKIM.
> Has that been done in this case?
Reverse IP for sending domain is done. SPF is implemented. DKIM is
not. I did just see that the Message-ID still has the
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:54:05PM -0400, David Golden wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Nigel Horne wrote:
> > Mails being directed to spam folders can often be fixed by enabling SPF and
> > DKIM.
> > Has that been done in this case?
>
> Reverse IP for sending domain is done. SPF is imp
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Barbie wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:54:05PM -0400, David Golden wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Nigel Horne wrote:
>> > Mails being directed to spam folders can often be fixed by enabling SPF and
>> > DKIM.
>> > Has that been done in this case?
>
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:54:05PM -0400, David Golden wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Nigel Horne wrote:
> > Mails being directed to spam folders can often be fixed by enabling SPF and
> > DKIM.
> > Has that been done in this case?
>
> Reverse IP for sending domain is done. SPF is imp
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Tony Cook wrote:
> From the message I received:
>
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1278993781.3ACe9.14472"
> Message-ID: 1278993781.8e75168.14...@domu-12-31-39-0b-24-e7
> MIME-Version: 1.0
Ah. Bug.
I'll send patches to Rik.
David
Hi, David.
Go ahead and create a new metabase profile and email it to me. I'll
work with Barbie to make sure all your identities get connected up.
-- David
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:42 PM, David Solimano wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently using dsolim...@cpan.org to submit test reports, but u
Hi David,
> Go ahead and create a new metabase profile and email it to me. I'll
> work with Barbie to make sure all your identities get connected up.
I've just gone through the listings for the past few months, and have
created 69 addtional mappings, of which 47 are new testers. These will
get c
bject: Re: Existing Testers -- please request your CT 2.0
profile
online
To: da...@solimano.org
Copies to: CPAN Testers Discuss
> Hi, David.
>
> Go ahead and create a new metabase profile and email it to me. I'll
> work with Barbie
12 matches
Mail list logo
