Getting to CPAN-testers 2.0

2008-09-04 Thread David Cantrell
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 07:13:44AM -0400, David Golden wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What are the issues in that time? Code or non-code? > mostly $job, @family, %life stuff Is there anyone involved who would be able to put more time in with a

Re: Getting to CPAN-testers 2.0

2008-09-04 Thread David Golden
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:43 AM, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 07:13:44AM -0400, David Golden wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > What are the issues in that time? Code or non-code? >> mostly $job, @family, %li

Re: Getting to CPAN-testers 2.0

2008-09-04 Thread Gabor Szabo
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:29 PM, David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So I don't think the challenge is really a TPF-supported coder -- I > think we need a small group of knowledgeable people to set aside time > to hammer out a design and pressure-test it. In short, you need a QA Hackathon :

Re: Getting to CPAN-testers 2.0

2008-09-04 Thread Barbie
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 10:29:09AM -0400, David Golden wrote: > The third major hurdle will be the migration plan -- how to cut over > to the new system, whether to port over old reports from NNTP, and > what to do about stragglers that still send reports the old way. That isn't as difficult as yo

Re: Getting to CPAN-testers 2.0

2008-09-04 Thread David Golden
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Barbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would the QA HAckathon that Birmingham.pm are doing next year be too far > away? Or perhaps we can use that as chance to bring the final pieces > together and iron out any integration and migration plans. I'd love it if we could h