Re: Testing CT2.0 with CPANPLUS

2010-03-16 Thread Serguei Trouchelle
Curtis Jewell wrote: If you wouldn't mind another Windows smoker, I can throw an x64/x86_64 Windows one at it. (a pre-beta Strawberry 5.11.5 :) ) If you manage it to work. :) There's some problem with parsing a report right now. -- Serguei Trouchelle

Re: Testing CT2.0 with CPANPLUS

2010-03-15 Thread Curtis Jewell
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:46 +, "Nigel Horne" wrote: > David Golden wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Nigel Horne wrote: > > > >> I can offer NetBSD, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Cygwin, BeOS, MacOS. Would you like > >> any of these? > >> > I forgot to include Hurd on the list. > > I'v

Re: Testing CT2.0 with CPANPLUS

2010-03-15 Thread Nigel Horne
David Golden wrote: On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Nigel Horne wrote: I can offer NetBSD, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Cygwin, BeOS, MacOS. Would you like any of these? I forgot to include Hurd on the list. I've been trying Minix but with no luck so far and I presume that Perl isn't availab

Re: Testing CT2.0 with CPANPLUS

2010-03-15 Thread Nigel Horne
Ricardo Signes wrote: * Nigel Horne [2010-03-14T11:23:34] David Golden wrote: On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Nigel Horne wrote: I can offer NetBSD, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Cygwin, BeOS, MacOS. Would you like any of these? Cygwin and BeOS would be great to have. Do you

Re: Testing CT2.0 with CPANPLUS

2010-03-14 Thread Ricardo Signes
* Nigel Horne [2010-03-14T11:23:34] > David Golden wrote: > >On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Nigel Horne wrote: > >>I can offer NetBSD, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Cygwin, BeOS, MacOS. Would you like > >>any of these? > > > >Cygwin and BeOS would be great to have. Do you mean MacOS or darwin? > >The la

Re: Testing CT2.0 with CPANPLUS

2010-03-14 Thread Curtis Jewell
If you wouldn't mind another Windows smoker, I can throw an x64/x86_64 Windows one at it. (a pre-beta Strawberry 5.11.5 :) ) --Curtis On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:02 -0400, "David Golden" wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Nigel Horne wrote: > > > >>> I could use at least one more CPANPLUS ba

Re: Testing CT2.0 with CPANPLUS

2010-03-14 Thread Nigel Horne
David Golden wrote: On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Nigel Horne wrote: I can offer NetBSD, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Cygwin, BeOS, MacOS. Would you like any of these? Cygwin and BeOS would be great to have. Do you mean MacOS or darwin? The latter would be good, the former isn't supported

Re: Testing CT2.0 with CPANPLUS

2010-03-14 Thread David Golden
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Nigel Horne wrote: > I can offer NetBSD, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Cygwin, BeOS, MacOS.  Would you like > any of these? Cygwin and BeOS would be great to have. Do you mean MacOS or darwin? The latter would be good, the former isn't supported by p5p anymore and I don't t

Re: Testing CT2.0 with CPANPLUS

2010-03-14 Thread Nigel Horne
I could use at least one more CPANPLUS based smoker in the beta test. What platforms do you currently have? I haven't actually checked the details. Linux and Solaris I believe. And Serguei is valiantly trying to make it work on Windows despite all the hurdles I'm throwing in hi

Re: Testing CT2.0 with CPANPLUS

2010-03-14 Thread David Golden
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Nigel Horne wrote: > >>> I could use at least one more CPANPLUS based smoker in the beta test. > > What platforms do you currently have? I haven't actually checked the details. Linux and Solaris I believe. And Serguei is valiantly trying to make it work on Windo

Re: Testing CT2.0 with CPANPLUS

2010-03-13 Thread Nigel Horne
I could use at least one more CPANPLUS based smoker in the beta test. What platforms do you currently have? -Nigel

Re: Testing CT2.0 with CPANPLUS

2010-03-12 Thread Chris 'BinGOs' Williams
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:48:59PM -0500, David Golden wrote: > It turns out the released version of CPANPLUS doesn't *quite* support > CT2.0 yet. I've committed a patch to fix that. But until BinGOs > releases a new version, people will need to checkout and install from > the repo here: > > $