On 27 Mar 2010, at 00:59, Elaine Ashton wrote:
The only snag I can forsee in trimming back on the abundance of modules is
the case where some modules have version requirements for other modules where
it will barf with a mismatch/newer version of the required module (I bumped
into this
On 27 Mar 2010, at 00:59, Andy Armstrong wrote:
On 27 Mar 2010, at 00:59, Elaine Ashton wrote:
The only snag I can forsee in trimming back on the abundance of modules is
the case where some modules have version requirements for other modules where
it will barf with a mismatch/newer version
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Nicholas Clark wrote:
I
You?
Or someone else?
I am quite happy to agree that your understanding and experience of storage
management is better than mine. But that's not the key question, in a
volunteer organisation. The questions I ask, repeating Jan's comments in
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 03:02:22PM -0800, Arthur Corliss wrote:
Why use rsync, then? Why not have checkpointed logs on cpan with
additions/removals logged by date so you can roll forward on the client,
processing only those files? It would be trivial to set up and a lot more
efficient.
Oh, I understand that fully. And I'd be happy to lend some of my
time. But
you don't make people inclined to help when people are lobbing snarky
comments like we'll wait breathlessly for you to do it.
The time-honored tradition of many open source communities is to talk.
And talk. And
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
The time-honored tradition of many open source communities is to talk. And
talk. And talk. The problem is that this solves nothing. To do, does.
You are free to decide to take this as a personal insult.
I didn't take it as an insult, I took
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Elaine Ashton wrote:
Actually, I thought I was merely offering my opinion both as the sysadmin for
the canonical CPAN mothership and as an end-user. If that makes me a prick,
well, I suppose I should go out and buy one :)
:-) You'll have to pardon my indiscriminate
7 matches
Mail list logo
