05. Schema
Proposal:
The META spec should come along with a formal schema definition.
(SlavenRezic)
Comments:
* There are at least two schema languages available for this task, both
with a Perl implementation: Kwalify and Data::Rx. For the old META 1.3
spec an attempt to define a Kwalify sc
* David Golden [2009-10-09T07:43:56]
> 05. Schema
>
> Proposal:
>
> The META spec should come along with a formal schema definition.
> (SlavenRezic)
No strong feelings. Not a bad idea. I believe an Rx schema for 1.4 exists.
--
rjbs
On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:43 AM, David Golden wrote:
05. Schema
Proposal:
The META spec should come along with a formal schema definition.
(SlavenRezic)
I am not so much concerned about a formal schema. But an official module
to validate, or purge bad data, would be great. otherwise users end up
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Graham Barr wrote:
>
> On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:43 AM, David Golden wrote:
>
>> 05. Schema
>>
>> Proposal:
>>
>> The META spec should come along with a formal schema definition.
>> (SlavenRezic)
>
> I am not so much concerned about a formal schema. But an official modul
Graham Barr wrote:
On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:43 AM, David Golden wrote:
05. Schema
Proposal:
The META spec should come along with a formal schema definition.
(SlavenRezic)
I am not so much concerned about a formal schema. But an official module
to validate, or purge bad data, would be great. ot
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 08:31:48AM -0500, Graham Barr wrote:
>
> On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:43 AM, David Golden wrote:
>
>> 05. Schema
>>
>> Proposal:
>>
>> The META spec should come along with a formal schema definition.
>> (SlavenRezic)
>
> I am not so much concerned about a formal schema. But an offic
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Barbie wrote:
> These already exist:
>
> Test::CPAN::Meta (uses Parse::CPAN::Meta)
> Test::JSON::Meta (uses JSON)
> Test::YAML::Meta (uses YAML or YAML::Syck)
I'm probably going to roll the logic from those into a single
"canonical" spec validator and try to push
David Golden wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Graham Barr wrote:
On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:43 AM, David Golden wrote:
05. Schema
Proposal:
The META spec should come along with a formal schema definition.
(SlavenRezic)
I am not so much concerned about a formal schema. But an official modul
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Slaven Rezic wrote:
> David Golden wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Graham Barr wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:43 AM, David Golden wrote:
>>>
05. Schema
Proposal:
The META spec should come along with a formal schema definit
9 matches
Mail list logo