CMSP 05. Schema

2009-10-09 Thread David Golden
05. Schema Proposal: The META spec should come along with a formal schema definition. (SlavenRezic) Comments: * There are at least two schema languages available for this task, both with a Perl implementation: Kwalify and Data::Rx. For the old META 1.3 spec an attempt to define a Kwalify sc

Re: CMSP 05. Schema

2009-10-09 Thread Ricardo Signes
* David Golden [2009-10-09T07:43:56] > 05. Schema > > Proposal: > > The META spec should come along with a formal schema definition. > (SlavenRezic) No strong feelings. Not a bad idea. I believe an Rx schema for 1.4 exists. -- rjbs

Re: CMSP 05. Schema

2009-10-09 Thread Graham Barr
On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:43 AM, David Golden wrote: 05. Schema Proposal: The META spec should come along with a formal schema definition. (SlavenRezic) I am not so much concerned about a formal schema. But an official module to validate, or purge bad data, would be great. otherwise users end up

Re: CMSP 05. Schema

2009-10-09 Thread David Golden
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Graham Barr wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:43 AM, David Golden wrote: > >> 05. Schema >> >> Proposal: >> >> The META spec should come along with a formal schema definition. >> (SlavenRezic) > > I am not so much concerned about a formal schema. But an official modul

Re: CMSP 05. Schema

2009-10-09 Thread Steffen Mueller
Graham Barr wrote: On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:43 AM, David Golden wrote: 05. Schema Proposal: The META spec should come along with a formal schema definition. (SlavenRezic) I am not so much concerned about a formal schema. But an official module to validate, or purge bad data, would be great. ot

Re: CMSP 05. Schema

2009-10-31 Thread Barbie
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 08:31:48AM -0500, Graham Barr wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:43 AM, David Golden wrote: > >> 05. Schema >> >> Proposal: >> >> The META spec should come along with a formal schema definition. >> (SlavenRezic) > > I am not so much concerned about a formal schema. But an offic

Re: CMSP 05. Schema

2009-10-31 Thread David Golden
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Barbie wrote: > These already exist: > > Test::CPAN::Meta (uses Parse::CPAN::Meta) > Test::JSON::Meta (uses JSON) > Test::YAML::Meta (uses YAML or YAML::Syck) I'm probably going to roll the logic from those into a single "canonical" spec validator and try to push

Re: CMSP 05. Schema

2009-10-31 Thread Slaven Rezic
David Golden wrote: On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Graham Barr wrote: On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:43 AM, David Golden wrote: 05. Schema Proposal: The META spec should come along with a formal schema definition. (SlavenRezic) I am not so much concerned about a formal schema. But an official modul

Re: CMSP 05. Schema

2009-11-02 Thread Adam Kennedy
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Slaven Rezic wrote: > David Golden wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Graham Barr wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:43 AM, David Golden wrote: >>> 05. Schema Proposal: The META spec should come along with a formal schema definit