2016-03-01 21:43 GMT+01:00 Peter Rabbitson :
> Are there other things out there targeting the same problem-domain? Is
> there something approaching a "cross-tooling convention" ?
>
>
>
cpanfile-dump
https://metacpan.org/pod/distribution/Module-CPANfile/script/cpanfile-dump
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> I didn't phrase my question correctly. What I am after is:
>
> Imagine you get a random checkout of some dist and/or extract a tarball.
> Aside from running `perl Makefile.PL` and visually checking what is
> missing,
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> Imagine you get a random checkout of some dist and/or extract a tarball.
> Aside from running `perl Makefile.PL` and visually checking what is
> missing, there is nothing semi-standard that will answer "what do I feed
On 03/01/2016 10:14 PM, David Golden wrote:
cpanm had --scan-deps, though it's now listed as deprecated.
I didn't phrase my question correctly. What I am after is:
Imagine you get a random checkout of some dist and/or extract a tarball.
Aside from running `perl Makefile.PL` and visually
> cpanm had --scan-deps, though it's now listed as deprecated.
>
> And CPAN has plenty of these sorts of things, eg. Perl::PrereqScanner
App::Midgen and the midgen script were designed to determine and list prereqs
of different types, in the formats expected by various things:
cpanm had --scan-deps, though it's now listed as deprecated.
And CPAN has plenty of these sorts of things, eg. Perl::PrereqScanner
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> I am currently aware of the Module::Install-specific targets of
> `make listdeps`
I am currently aware of the Module::Install-specific targets of
`make listdeps` (only what is needed to satisfy test/runtime prereqs)
`make listalldeps` (everything the metadata knows about)
There is the dzil alternative of:
`dzil listdeps` (everything)
`dzil listdeps
7 matches
Mail list logo