2009/3/11 ZaeX :
> Hi,Roman:
>
> I have tried adding call policy on my constructor, but I'm really no good at
> this.
> I have tried all the combinations below but none of them work:
>
> init const& >()[with_custodian_and_ward_postcall<0, 2> >()]
> init const& >()[with_custodian_and_ward_postcall<1
> By the way, is there a simple way to iterate through a fusion sequence or
> transformation of it with a python iterator?
Do you mean making it an indexing suite, like Boost.Python does for
vectors and maps? I guess it would be possible by using the
indexing_suite base class (never did that befor
I should add that the deadline for this appears to be tomorrow (the
12th).
Niall
On 11 Mar 2009 at 20:50, Niall Douglas wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2009 at 13:42, Ravi wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 11 March 2009 12:38:55 Haoyu Bai wrote:
> > > > 1. Thread safety
> > > > 2. PyFinalize support
> > > > 3. Eas
On 11 Mar 2009 at 13:42, Ravi wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 March 2009 12:38:55 Haoyu Bai wrote:
> > > 1. Thread safety
> > > 2. PyFinalize support
> > > 3. Easier methods to write to_python/from_python converters
> > > 4. Python 3.0 support
> > > 5. Ability to extend the fundamental PyTypeObject used
William MariƩ wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a function in boost python ( C++ side ) to do the equivalent
of del dict[key] but i can't find it .
Thank you very much
I think you want:
boost::python::object obj;
obj["where"].del();
-t
___
Cplusplus-
Hi,
I'm looking for a function in boost python ( C++ side ) to do the equivalent
of del dict[key] but i can't find it .
Thank you very much
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/del-dict-key--equivalent---tp22462620p22462620.html
Sent from the Python - c++-sig mailing list arc
Haoyu Bai wrote:
Hi,
I have posted this to Boost development mailling list before and many
people suggested me to repost here, so I did.
I'm a student who has finished SWIG's Python 3.0 support in GSoC 2008.
I'd like to contribute my knowledge of Python 3 migration to
Boost.Python, by implement
On Wednesday 11 March 2009 12:38:55 Haoyu Bai wrote:
> > 1. Thread safety
> > 2. PyFinalize support
> > 3. Easier methods to write to_python/from_python converters
> > 4. Python 3.0 support
> > 5. Ability to extend the fundamental PyTypeObject used by boost.python
>
> Thanks! Seems there's a lot of
Hi,
I have posted this to Boost development mailling list before and many
people suggested me to repost here, so I did.
I'm a student who has finished SWIG's Python 3.0 support in GSoC 2008.
I'd like to contribute my knowledge of Python 3 migration to
Boost.Python, by implementing Python 3 suppor
It seems very useful to me.
By the way, is there a simple way to iterate through a fusion sequence or
transformation of it with a python iterator?
Luca.
2009/2/27 Bruno Lalande
> Hello,
>
> The topic below was opened in the Boost development mailing list,
> where it's been pointed out to me tha
Hi,Roman:
I have tried adding call policy on my constructor, but I'm really no good at
this.
I have tried all the combinations below but none of them work:
- init const& >()[with_custodian_and_ward_postcall<0, 2>
>()]
- init const& >()[with_custodian_and_ward_postcall<1, 2>
>()]
-
11 matches
Mail list logo