Since I didn't see any other responses, I'll offer what I know, even though it
doesn't directly answer
your question.
A few years ago I experimented with SWIG - Boost.Python integration, where you
can get easy access
from C++ to SWIG-wrapped objects, inside a function wrapped with Boost.Python.
I and David wrote the page currently shown seven years ago.
A few years ago I sent a query to the Python people, about updating the page,
but I never got a reply.
I guess it is time to try again!
My best idea for an updated page is simply this shortened version:
SIG for development of Python/C+
2009/4/8 Michał Nowotka :
> Hello,
Good evening
> I want to expose following classes:
>
> class A
> {
> public:
> A(int a, int b)
> :a_(a),b_(b)
> {}
> int a_;
> int b_;
>
> int compute(){return a_ + b_;}
>
> };
>
> class C : public A
> {
>
> public:
>
>
I'm trying to build the tutorial example in the Boost.Python package
(the package itself compiled and works (I think)) bjam says the test
passes and gives output redirected to a file, but when I try to run the
python script myself, it says it can't find module hello_ext. I have
attached an exa
Hi Brian,
in this case I think the correct solution is use "return_self<>()"
verify documentation in:
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_38_0/libs/python/doc/v2/return_arg.html#return_self-spec
BR
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Buras, Brian wrote:
> I'm trying to wrap an API that uses method chai
I'm trying to wrap an API that uses method chaining (methods that return
reference to same object) and restricts assignment/copy. Is there a reason I
can't use return_internal_reference?
# want to be able to do this in Python
d = myexample.Derived("name")
d.setSomething(500).execute()
But I ge
on Thu Mar 19 2009, "Niall Douglas" wrote:
> On 19 Mar 2009 at 21:53, Haoyu Bai wrote:
>
>> I'm felling the difference between char*, unsinged char* and the
>> constant version and std::vector version of them would be a bit
>> complicated and confusing. We may document it clearly, but things are
on Wed Mar 18 2009, "Niall Douglas" wrote:
> On 18 Mar 2009 at 2:07, Haoyu Bai wrote:
>
>> According to the current behavior of Boost.Python converters, the
>> wrapped function in Python 3 will return a b"Hello" (which is a bytes
>> object but not a string). So code like this will broken:
>>
>>
on Wed Apr 01 2009, Haoyu Bai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did some preliminary work on BPL py3k support in these days.
>
> With Troy's help we have a py3k SVN tree in sandbox now, which is
> branched from trunk. I also tried to compile BPL with Python 3, and by
> following the error report of the compile
I just stumbled on this, which is way out of date:
http://www.python.org/community/sigs/current/cplusplus-sig/
Anybody know how to get it updated?
-t
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cpl
Hello,
I want to expose following classes:
class A
{
public:
A(int a, int b)
:a_(a),b_(b)
{}
int a_;
int b_;
int compute(){return a_ + b_;}
};
class C : public A
{
public:
C(int a, int b)
:A(a,b){}
};
struct TypeExposer // I have to ad
11 matches
Mail list logo
