Hi Alexey,
you can use this example to see how create converter rules in
boost:pyhton:
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_39_0/libs/python/doc/v2/faq.html#custom_string
or you can expose you class to pyhon using boost:python in normal way.
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_39_0/libs/python/doc/tutori
Hi,
Here is a question.(see Subject title) I am particularly interested in such
implementation using python.boost library.
For simple cases I've seen examples, such as:
int x = extract(obj.attr("Attribute_name"))
However, when a type T in extract() becomes user-specified things become
harder. For
Hi Paul
In my bindings I had a problem like this, to solve I created a simple
class like that:
class thread_locker
{
thread_locker()
{
if (thread_support::enabled())
m_gstate = PyGILState_Ensure();
}
~thread_locker()
{
if (thread_support::enabled())
PyGILState_Release(m_g
Whoops, I think this problem is a little uglier than I thought, since you
overrode the onTick() function in python with a call to print, which needs
access to the interpreter in your new thread. See the link Thomas posted for
dealing with the GIL (along with worrying about any possible garbage
It looks to me like you have a garbage collection problem going on. If you
create a wrapped c++ object in python, then python is going to own the object
and will destroy it when its reference count goes to 0. In your python example
script at the bottom, you call the Ticker's run() function, wh
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Paul Scruby wrote:
> I am having some problems using boost::python with boost::thread. I'm using
> threads because I want to run some tasks in the background when I'm using
> the Python's interactive shell. However, when I use get_override() to call
> a Python
I am having some problems using boost::python with boost::thread. I'm using
threads because I want to run some tasks in the background when I'm using
the Python's interactive shell. However, when I use get_override() to call
a Python method from another boost::thread it crashes internally. F
