On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 11:53 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> No luck with boost-1.42. fedora-12 boost-1.39 seems OK.
>
> Lots of errors, like:
> /usr/local/src/boost.hg/boost/fusion/container/vector/convert.hpp: In
> instantiation of
> 'boost::fusion::result_of::as_vector,
>
> 0>, boost::fusion::v
On 03/08/2010 07:41 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Do you intend to include some examples?
That is unfortunately not quite easy, as the (in this context)
interesting bits are mixed with lots of other code that is not relevant
here.
I will try to refactor things the way I envision this array wra
Do you intend to include some examples?
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
Cplusplus-sig@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig
No luck with boost-1.42. fedora-12 boost-1.39 seems OK.
Lots of errors, like:
/usr/local/src/boost.hg/boost/fusion/container/vector/convert.hpp: In
instantiation of
'boost::fusion::result_of::as_vector,
0>, boost::fusion::vector_iterator,
-0x1> > >':
include/ndarray/views.hpp
On 03/09/2010 06:34 AM, Pim Schellart wrote:
for fast numerical calculations callbacks into Python are not a good option.
In terms of the discussion concerning compiled or header only I think
that although it would be nice and clean to have a header only
library, as it stands boost python has to
Hi Everyone,
wow! I am overwhelmed by the amount of response to this request.
I looked at the other options and must say I agree with Jim Bosch' comment:
> The whole point of using numpy with C++ is to be able to go
> from raw pointers to numpy arrays and back, and that doesn't seem to be
> possi
