Re: [C++-sig] Generating API documentation when using boost::python

On 04/15/2010 03:53 AM, Murray Cumming wrote: (If anyone can suggest a better alternative to nasty pydoc, I'd be glad.) Well, Sphinx, , is the new standard for Python documentation, but I don't think it has any way to extract documentation from your boost python

Re: [C++-sig] Make threading support official

I was not originally going to say anything but from what i have skimmed from all these emails seems like someone really needs multithread safety in boost python. Turns out I needed the same thing about 2 months ago, and I looked at TnFOX, changed a few things, patched a couple files, and I am fair

Re: [C++-sig] Make threading support official

On 12 Apr 2010 at 23:20, troy d. straszheim wrote: > I don't grok it just yet. The code prevents locking around any call to > a function that returns a py_iter_, and the specialization mechanism > you've built would allow you to prevent locking around functions that > return other types, but t

[C++-sig] Generating API documentation when using boost::python

I tried running pydoc on my python module, (implemented here http://git.gnome.org/browse/glom/tree/glom/python_embed/python_module/py_glom_module.cc#n35 ) but the output has lots of stuff that is uninteresting to Python coders, even after using docstring_options. For instance: http://www.murrayc.co