Re: [C++-sig] boost::python::set missing?

2011-03-01 Thread Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
> I think that's a fine idea. (My guess is that it didn't make it into the > boost.python API because it was added after the initial API had been >designed.) That's exactly right. Boost.Python was developed when Python 2.2 had just come out. (Boost.Python 1 was even based on 1.5.2) I'm not a

Re: [C++-sig] boost::python::set missing?

2011-03-01 Thread Stefan Seefeld
On 2011-03-01 17:14, Wichert Akkerman wrote: I noticed that the standard python set type is not exposed. Are there any plans to add that? I think that's a fine idea. (My guess is that it didn't make it into the boost.python API because it was added after the initial API had been designed.)

[C++-sig] boost::python::set missing?

2011-03-01 Thread Wichert Akkerman
I noticed that the standard python set type is not exposed. Are there any plans to add that? Wichert. -- Wichert AkkermanIt is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. ___ Cplusplus-sig mailin

Re: [C++-sig] Status of Numpy support in boost python - III

2011-03-01 Thread Stefan Seefeld
Hi Andrea, welcome to this community, and thank you for your interest into the GSoC program. Could you elaborate a little on what you would like to be working on, i.e. in what way you would like to improve the existing numeric support in boost.python ? Thanks, Stefan -- ...

[C++-sig] Status of Numpy support in boost python - III

2011-03-01 Thread Andrea Arteaga
Hello. My name is Andrea Arteaga and I'm student of Computational Science and Engineering at the ETH Zurich. I see in the wiki page and in this mailing list that you have a project whithin the Goog