Re: [C++-sig] GSoC 2011 proposal for improved NumPy wrapper ?

2011-03-25 Thread Jim Bosch
On 03/25/2011 04:12 AM, Stefan Seefeld wrote: On 2011-03-25 06:55, Neal Becker wrote: John Reid wrote: Is support planned for boost::multi_arrays? If not, can I add my +1? John. If we're considering support for various c++ libs, ones to consider might include: eigen boost::multi_array boos

Re: [C++-sig] language-binding.net website not available

2011-03-25 Thread Roman Yakovenko
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Maciej Sitarz wrote: > Hi > Hello. > since some time the Py++ project's homepage is down. Does anyone know why? Yes. I do not have time to maintain it. > Was it moved somewhere or there's some mirror available? > You can find everything you need on http://

[C++-sig] language-binding.net website not available

2011-03-25 Thread Maciej Sitarz
Hi since some time the Py++ project's homepage is down. Does anyone know why? Was it moved somewhere or there's some mirror available? I also haven't seen Roman Yakovenko posting here recently. Thanks for any info. Regards -- Maciek Sitarz ___ Cplusplus

Re: [C++-sig] GSoC 2011 proposal for improved NumPy wrapper ?

2011-03-25 Thread Stefan Seefeld
On 2011-03-25 06:55, Neal Becker wrote: John Reid wrote: Is support planned for boost::multi_arrays? If not, can I add my +1? John. If we're considering support for various c++ libs, ones to consider might include: eigen boost::multi_array boost::ublas nt2? The other day we seemed to agr

Re: [C++-sig] GSoC 2011 proposal for improved NumPy wrapper ?

2011-03-25 Thread Neal Becker
John Reid wrote: > On 24/03/11 20:14, Jim Bosch wrote: >> If we start with boost/python/numpy, I think the most important tasks are: >> - Add "object manager" classes for additional numpy types ("object >> managers" are Boost.Python versions of Python types; right now >> boost/python/numpy only su

Re: [C++-sig] GSoC 2011 proposal for improved NumPy wrapper ?

2011-03-25 Thread John Reid
On 24/03/11 20:14, Jim Bosch wrote: If we start with boost/python/numpy, I think the most important tasks are: - Add "object manager" classes for additional numpy types ("object managers" are Boost.Python versions of Python types; right now boost/python/numpy only supports the most important nump