On 30 Aug 2011 at 10:42, Jim Bosch wrote:
> I agree with all of the above, and these could all be solved by my
> proposal of having per-module registrations take precedence over gloal
> registrations. Having a single optimal converter is clearly the best
> solution when such a thing exists, an
On 08/30/2011 07:58 AM, Jay Riley wrote:
Self is indeed a PyObject*
this is a bit confusing
I'm afraid my next piece of advice is to simplify this like crazy, and
see if you can replicate the problem in a very minimal example. If you
can get it small enough, I can take a look at the whole
On 08/30/2011 04:04 AM, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
On 08/30/2011 02:42 AM, Jim Bosch wrote:
On 08/29/2011 09:41 AM, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
On 08/28/2011 02:14 PM, Jim Bosch wrote:
To solve it, I think you'd want anything registered by a specific
module to appear both in that module's registry and t
On 08/30/2011 07:45 AM, Josh Stratton wrote:
Oh, okay. So I can create a module...
#include "scene.h"
BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(scene)
{
class_("Scene");
}
and then import it (even though) in my python I normally don't import
things I'm not creating. I'm assuming this is a boost-python thing t
On 08/30/2011 01:26 AM, Hans Meine wrote:
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 08:42:53 schrieb Jim Bosch:
I don't see how having a global registry makes things any worse from an
ODR perspective. It seems like it's mostly just the same "where do
templates get instantiated" problem that compilers and l
Self is indeed a PyObject*
this is a bit confusing
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:00:11 -0700
> From: tallji...@gmail.com
> To: cplusplus-sig@python.org
> Subject: Re: [C++-sig] Boost Python loss of values
>
> On 08/26/2011 08:27 AM, Jay Riley wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestion,
Oh, okay. So I can create a module...
#include "scene.h"
BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(scene)
{
class_("Scene");
}
and then import it (even though) in my python I normally don't import
things I'm not creating. I'm assuming this is a boost-python thing to
get the class into scope, which gets rid of th
On 08/30/2011 02:42 AM, Jim Bosch wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 09:41 AM, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>> On 08/28/2011 02:14 PM, Jim Bosch wrote:
>>>
>>> To solve it, I think you'd want anything registered by a specific
>>> module to appear both in that module's registry and the global
>>> registry, with the mo
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 08:42:53 schrieb Jim Bosch:
> I don't see how having a global registry makes things any worse from an
> ODR perspective. It seems like it's mostly just the same "where do
> templates get instantiated" problem that compilers and linkers always
> have to deal with.
The
