Re: [C++-sig] pybind11 -- alternative to Boost.Python

2015-10-20 Thread Wenzel Jakob
I use that by default for compiling Python bindings. It should not make any difference for just a single file (including this testcase), but I found that it yields consistently smaller shared libraries when dealing with lots of compilation units. Wenzel > On Oct 20, 2015, at 1:33 PM, Neal Beck

Re: [C++-sig] pybind11 -- alternative to Boost.Python

2015-10-20 Thread Neal Becker
I noticed you used -flto when building the shared libs. Do you find this makes a difference? ___ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig