On 19.01.2017 19:48, 奇真亦假 wrote:
> Thank you very much. You really do me a lot.
>
> As I know, it seems that boost::python::set has missed for several years.
Right. I'll see whether I can add it for the next release. (Note,
though, that this is only a convenience interface. There is nothing you
ca
Thank you very much. You really do me a lot.
As I know, it seems that boost::python::set has missed for several years.
2017-01-20 4:23 GMT+08:00 Stefan Seefeld :
> On 18.01.2017 23:04, 奇真亦假 wrote:
> > It's strange that boost::python don't support boost::python::set.
>
> Indeed, a wrapper type fo
