Thanks Ralf.
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Ralf Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
> Thanks, I've updated the web page. I simply took this from the RDkit page:
>
> A collection of cheminformatics and machine-learning software written in
> C++ and Python.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov
Hi,
A colleague pointed out to me that the "Project using Boost.Python"
document (http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_52_0/libs/python/doc/projects.html)
includes a link to Rational Discovery LLC, a company that no longer
exists (we shut it down in 2006). That link, which now re-directs to
some comple
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Paul Melis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to see proof of the claim that SWIG's wrapper code is
> inefficient. In my experience it is not more inefficient than what, for
> example, boost.python via Py++ provides.
I was curious about the claims of SWIG's inef
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Alan Baljeu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It was a personal question. Do you specifically do much wrapping stuff or
> not? I'm
> trying to gauge your approach compared to how much you do it. I mean, if I
> had
> to wrap one C++ function I would of course use th
