On 30.03.2015 22:37, Huebl, Axel wrote:
> On 30.03.2015 17:42, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>> On 30/03/15 11:16 AM, Huebl, Axel wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> adding more Python 3 features, the "contains" method was added (in 1.55.0?)
>>>
On 30.03.2015 17:42, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> On 30/03/15 11:16 AM, Huebl, Axel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> adding more Python 3 features, the "contains" method was added (in 1.55.0?)
>> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_55_0/libs/python/doc/news.html
>&
Hi,
adding more Python 3 features, the "contains" method was added (in 1.55.0?)
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_55_0/libs/python/doc/news.html
Unfortunately, I found a nasty compile bug when compiling with nvcc that
I tried to fix in
https://github.com/boostorg/python/pull/14
Does anyone kn
both the c++-sig as well as the boost mailing lists. I
>> think the former might be slightly better to discuss boost.python
>> issues, if only for the higher SNR.
>>
>> FWIW,
>> Stefan
>>
>> On 02/02/15 01:43 PM, Huebl, Axel wrote:
>>&g
Hm, the language binding is dead and 404
http://sourceforge.net/p/boost/mailman/boost-langbinding/
Has anyone an idea about my question? :)
Best,
Axel
On 28.01.2015 15:21, Huebl, Axel wrote:
> Oh I just realized
> boost-langbinding
>
> is the better place to report this.
>
Oh I just realized
boost-langbinding
is the better place to report this.
Sry for cross-posting, I will migrate my question there.
Best,
Axel
On 28.01.2015 15:01, Huebl, Axel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was directed here from the Boost groups homepage
> http://www.boost.org/community
Hi,
I was directed here from the Boost groups homepage
http://www.boost.org/community/groups.html#cplussig
so I hope my question is well placed.
I was wondering if, how and when patches for Boost.Python (specially bug
fixes) are merged.
When I reported two bugs (including patches) beginning o
