troy d. straszheim schrieb am Montag 23 Februar 2009 um 19:51:
> Maik Beckmann wrote:
> > Considering what Murray done so far, I really doubt he makes this kind of
> > a mistake. :P
>
> Experts can make this mistake too. I wasn't being condescending. The
> er
troy d. straszheim schrieb am Montag 23 Februar 2009 um 19:15:
> > Murray Cumming schrieb am Montag 23 Februar 2009 um 12:39:
> >> I'm trying to support this notation in python:
> >> something = record["somefieldname"]
[snip]
> You're trying to subscript a class, not an instance of a class. I be
Murray Cumming schrieb am Montag 23 Februar 2009 um 12:39:
> I'm trying to support this notation in python:
> something = record["somefieldname"]
[snip]
> I'm now trying to do this with boost::python, like so, because googling
> has suggested that this should work:
>
> boost::python::class_("Record
Roman Yakovenko gmail.com> writes:
> > /
> > // test template member function in template class
> > // THIS WON'T WORK!
> > template
> > class BFunc
> > {
> > public:
> > template
> > T foo(const T& t) co
Hello,
Question:
Is it possible do implement numpy like fancy indexing with boost.python?
Motivation:
I'm playing with boost.python (and py++) to generate python bindings for some
C++ code. N-dimensional arrays are involved with an api like this
{{{
template
class Array
{
...
public:
Array(tr
