Re: [C++-sig] PyQt (SIP) and Boost.Python interop?

2009-04-14 Thread Marcus Lindblom
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote: Since I didn't see any other responses, I'll offer what I know, even though it doesn't directly answer your question. A few years ago I experimented with SWIG - Boost.Python integration, where you can get easy access from C++ to SWIG-wrapped objects, inside a fu

[C++-sig] PyQt (SIP) and Boost.Python interop?

2009-04-07 Thread Marcus Lindblom
Hi, We're in a spot where we're using third-party libraries that use different python wrappers. (Boost.Python, SIP currently, possibly SWIG later). Our own C++-classes are wrapped with Boost.Python a.t.m, but some of them contain Qt-objects, so PyQT needs to be used for that. Python is dyna

Re: [C++-sig] Boost Pro Python Version

2009-01-28 Thread Marcus Lindblom
Cameron Royal wrote: So I'm having some difficulty getting one of the boost.python tutorial examples working. In particular the class with a string constuctor. http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_37_0/libs/python/doc/tutorial/doc/html/python/exposing.html#python.constructors This exact example cras

Re: [C++-sig] [py++] Problem: empty xml file created

2008-12-06 Thread Marcus Lindblom
Roman Yakovenko wrote: On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Marcus Lindblom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How does gccxml work in compiler-work-alike mode? [snip] I am not sure what you mean by this. GCC-XML doesn't tries to emulate other compilers. The configuration is used to find s

Re: [C++-sig] [py++] Problem: empty xml file created

2008-12-05 Thread Marcus Lindblom
Marcus Lindblom wrote: Marcus Lindblom wrote: (I don't think the gccxml-call happens because of the call to the ModuleBuilder at line 813, although I might be wrong?) Waitaminute. When I'm rerunning it now, the order makes more sense, and the cache-calls come up after th

Re: [C++-sig] boost.python: private copy constructor problem

2008-12-02 Thread Marcus Lindblom
Mihail Konstantinov wrote: Stefan Seefeld wrote: In this case you want to tell Python that your object is non-copyable: I followed your suggestion and still get the same error message: [snip] /home/mihail/temporary/boost_1_37_0/boost/python/object/value_holder.hpp: In constructor ‘boost

Re: [C++-sig] [py++] Problem: empty xml file created

2008-12-02 Thread Marcus Lindblom
Marcus Lindblom wrote: (I don't think the gccxml-call happens because of the call to the ModuleBuilder at line 813, although I might be wrong?) Waitaminute. When I'm rerunning it now, the order makes more sense, and the cache-calls come up after the calls to ModuleBuilder. Probabl

Re: [C++-sig] [py++] Problem: empty xml file created

2008-12-02 Thread Marcus Lindblom
Roman Yakovenko wrote: On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Marcus Lindblom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok. It came right back at me: pyopensg/src> ** the above ** Could not determine compiler setting. Could not determine GCCXML_FLAGS setting. pyopensg/src> So, I changed it to run

Re: [C++-sig] [py++] Problem: empty xml file created

2008-12-02 Thread Marcus Lindblom
Roman Yakovenko wrote: 2008/12/2 Marcus Lindblom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi all, I'm trying to get OpenSG's python-bindings to work on Windows (and contruibuting that back to the project), and trying to track down an exception that get's thrown when running it's gen_

[C++-sig] [py++] Problem: empty xml file created

2008-12-02 Thread Marcus Lindblom
Hi all, I'm trying to get OpenSG's python-bindings to work on Windows (and contruibuting that back to the project), and trying to track down an exception that get's thrown when running it's gen_bindings.py. (see attached log.txt for output) The source for gen_bindings.py is here, for referen