Re: [C++-sig] Compiling boost python

2020-04-30 Thread Skip Montanaro
> How the cmake support for pybind ? I don't know cmake, but I did use pybind11 at my last job. It's nothing more than header files (no libraries to link). I doubt it would be difficult to support. Skip ___ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@pytho

[C++-sig] Fwd: Wrapping a singleton using pybind11?

2017-01-23 Thread Skip Montanaro
#x27;s turning out not to be the case, at least not for me. I suppose if was an actual C++ programmer, I would be further along at this point. Thanks, Skip Montanaro ___ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig

Re: [C++-sig] Getting Boost.Python to explain itself better?

2016-06-18 Thread Skip Montanaro
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Skip Montanaro wrote: > > >>> pro2 = service.Provider("Skip-hacking", {}) > ArgumentError Python argument types in > Provider.__init__(Provider, str, dict) > did not match C++ signature: > __init__(boost::python::api::o

[C++-sig] Getting Boost.Python to explain itself better?

2016-06-18 Thread Skip Montanaro
I'm trying to debug an assertion error from Boost.Python, but having no luck. I'm not a C++ programmer, but to my eyes, it seems like my call should work. I'm using Boost 1.47.0 on an openSuSE 12.2 platform, with GCC/G++ 4.4. These parameters are fixed (that is, suggestions that I update any of the

[C++-sig] Boost.Python and PEP 384

2010-03-20 Thread Skip Montanaro
Do Boost.Python-generated extension modules conform to PEP 384's constraints for ABI compatibility? Thx, Skip Montanaro ___ Cplusplus-sig mailing list Cplusplus-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig